Agenda - Council - 03/22/2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

be required at the time of preliminary 15-'lat re¥iew and approval. The Developer has consulted with City Staff regarding the tree preservation plan and some oak wilt control work on Community Development DireCtor Trudgeon iexplained a traffic generation will required at the time of preliminary plat} revieTM. The sketch plan proposes public access from 3 entrances onto Vario!i~te S~eet, which is acceptable Department. Traprock Street is ;also Prop°Sed t0 be extended north from ,ck Commons to the soUth. At the time:Trapro~.k commons was Stree~ ~as terminated in a temporary cul-d~sac with~ the intention the property to the north: Community Development Direr-. ~tor Trudge'On ?dvised park dedication requirements bY,the ParkiComxssmn that at a minimum, trail develOp,ment Will the northernmost boundary of:~e plat.: ~0th& direction through the plat to cotmect the:~ail Community Development Dire~or Trudgeon explained the City Si recommending approval of the applicant's request for Plan Amendment fei First, all three of the development ~'~ citY Council and Commission show the subject property bein because of its size, Second, Sweet Bay igc ~an.! Assessment Worksheet (EAW), water control in greater which will address trans . ~ . detail than the comprehensive p~lan Metropolitan Staff and they indicated that there is currChtly service property south of Trott Brook. Met isa'false of the CitY processing comprehensive plan amendments to~ aceomm( services and adv. ised the City to submit the major Compri~h~hsive Plan~ systems plans are updated. Citizen InpuL Mr. John Oakwood Land Development, stated his profession is anei an&he w6rked hard to create quality homes for families. :;i He. stated he is and issues that are there. He stated different agencies, including: the Metropoii feel it is engironmentally right to develop these large open spaces with:urban Mr. Peterson ~'~ied the general ~consensuS of the neighborhood is that the area will eventually develop with mdhicipal sewer and water; He indicated, there will not be any townhomes on these two sites. He noted if municipal sewerI and Water is brought to these sites, they have two development proposals at densities that are less than what the ordinance allows for R-1 with municipal sewer and water. Mr. peterson stated the neighborhood he many homes as they can on the land. He iWanB:to develop is not an example of cramming as Stated .they have spread out the density throughout the Planning commisSion/March 3, 2005 ibage 4of 22 proposed Plat was reViewed · It is anticipated to Var-i, Alpine Drive to in an east/west Central Park.