Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Woestehoff stated that although he is also not thrilled with that aspect, he <br />acknowledged how flexible and cooperative the applicant has been throughout this process. He <br />stated that in his opinion he is comfortable with staff following up and cooperating with the <br />applicant and approving the request contingent upon that cooperation. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to recommend that <br />City Council approve of the site plan contingent upon compliance with Staff Review comments, <br />plantings behind the garages, benches or pedestrian sitting areas behind the garages, and for the <br />developer to work with the City on the development of a pleasing air conditioning unit façade. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners Anderson, VanScoy, Gengler, <br />Johnson, Peters, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />6.02: Consider Updated Sketch Plan for Rivenwick (Project #19-102); Case of Paxmar <br /> <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Maass presented the Staff Report and recommendation to approve of the <br />sketch plan contingent upon compliance with Staff Review, specifically that the multifamily <br />th <br />residential property shown north of 139 Lane NW and south of Highway 10 be revised to show <br />a second commercial pad. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if this would only apply to the R-3 section or the entire plan. <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Maass noted that this would be the entire concept plan and the R-3 section <br />specifically would come forward for formal review in the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that the staff recommendation changes the proposal and asked <br />how that was received. <br /> <br />Allen Roessler, 2150 Cutters Grove in Anoka, stated that this is basically the same sketch that <br />was previously presented with the only change swapping the R-2 and R-3 parcels. He noted that <br />Suite Living would like to move forward now and that is the reason for the change, as there are <br />not other users yet for the other two uses. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if the applicant is comfortable with the recommendations from the <br />City. <br /> <br />Mr. Roessler stated that he was a bit confused as the previously approved concept included 80 <br />percent residential and 20 percent commercial and they would like that percentage rate to remain. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ June 6, 2019 <br />Page 17 of 21 <br /> <br />