Laserfiche WebLink
Community Development Director Gladhill clarified that the previous concept had R-2 against <br />R-2, whereas this concept has R-2 between Suite Living and the commercial. He noted that this <br />concept would place Suite Living against the existing R-2. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer explained that typically you try to transition between zoning districts rather <br />than placing low density between high density and commercial. <br /> <br />Mr. Roessler replied that Suite Living is not traditional high-density housing. He stated that if <br />this does not fit, they would not find a buyer for the residential parcel. He stated that there have <br />been a lot of residential developers interested in this layout. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that the zoning decision does not need to be <br />made at this time and Suite Living could move forward as proposed. <br /> <br />Mr. Roessler stated that although commercial development would be preferred, this layout is the <br />most likely outcome based on the market. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that if the Commission were to say they would prefer commercial <br />and there is a developer in the future that would like to create R-2, would there then be an issue <br />that could not be resolved. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Gladhill noted that this is a sketch plan and therefore the <br />Council will use this input as feedback. He stated that this would not provide a zoning or site <br />plan approval. He noted that further review would be done if this moves forward in formal <br />application. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if Suite Living would be located in B-2 or R-3. <br /> <br />Mr. Roessler stated that Suite Living would be R-3 and commercial would be B-2, while the R-2 <br />would most likely be townhomes. He stated that once a user or buyer is found, a more concrete <br />plan would come forward. He stated that he does have multiple residential developers interested <br />in this proposed layout. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Johnson, to recommend that <br />City Council approve the sketch plan contingent upon compliance with Staff Review. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Bauer, Commissioners VanScoy, Johnson, Anderson, <br />Gengler, Peters, and Woestehoff. Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />6.03: Consider Site Plan for Delta ModTech (Project #19-108); Case of Delta ModTech <br /> <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Consultant Maass presented the Staff Report and the recommendation to approve the <br />site plan contingent upon compliance with the 60-foot residential buffer yard setback either <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ June 6, 2019 <br />Page 18 of 21 <br /> <br />