Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Riley stated that currently the proposed budget is an increase of 6.77 percent, <br />and prior year funds are being used to buy it down to that amount. He stated that while he <br />approves of the buying down, he would like to see the rate closer to six percent. He stated that it <br />was said earlier that $91,000 would need to be cut to reach six percent. He noted that with the <br />surplus funds exceeding $400,000 and $600,000 in the past two years, he would think it realistic <br />that an additional $91,000 could be cut from the budget without impacting bond ratings. <br />Mayor LeTourneau asked for additional information on the surplus piece, as it was determined <br />that the surplus is composed of different forms of revenue. He asked if the desire would be to <br />estimate projected building permit revenue further. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he has not done the analysis to determine where the large <br />surplus amounts are coming from. He stated that if that is coming from building permit revenue, <br />then perhaps that item be adjusted. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that the budget is balanced based on revenue against expenses. He <br />stated that the larger savings would be on the expense side. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that he would like to see the levy reduced. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that in order to reduce the levy they would make more <br />aggressive revenue projections. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that the City would not want to over project revenues. She <br />stated that it can appear good on paper but that might not be a real project of revenue and <br />expenses. <br />Mayor LeTourneau stated that currently the City uses a conservative approach to projecting <br />revenue and some commented that a more aggressive approach would be better. He stated that it <br />appears now that the statement is being made that over projecting revenues would not look good <br />on paper. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she would not want to just say there will more revenue just <br />to make the expenses look less. She stated that she would like to see both revenues and expenses <br />accurately projected. She referenced the Happy Days budget of $12,000, noting that the <br />projected revenue is $15,000. She asked how the additional revenue from the event is then <br />allocated. <br />Finance Director Lund explained that the City contributes $12,000 to the Happy Days account <br />and the organization receives contributions from businesses and sponsors. She stated that Happy <br />Days is a standalone fund and the contribution from the City and any other contributions that the <br />organization receives, stay with that organization. <br />City Council Special Work Session / September 3, 2019 <br />Page 9 of 17 <br />