My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/24/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2019
>
Agenda - Council - 09/24/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 2:33:55 PM
Creation date
10/10/2019 9:30:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/24/2019
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
664
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor LeToumeau asked if there is consensus on the preliminary budget with the understanding <br />that the Council and staff would still have additional time to attempt to decrease that amount <br />before final adoption in December. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that if there was consensus on reducing the budget to six <br />percent, which would be a decrease of $91,000, he is confident that staff could get to that point. <br />He agreed that would allow more time after preliminary adoption to continue to review the <br />budget prior to final adoption. <br />Councilmember Heinrich agreed that reducing the budget by $91,000 would be a good start. She <br />stated that she also has a few additional items that she would like to address. She referenced the <br />park and recreation specialist, which is included in this budget but was not approved by the <br />Council. She stated that her assumption is that the position would not be included as it was not <br />approved by the Council. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that one of the issues for staff is that the alternative is more <br />expensive than the position. He explained that the Council needs to provide input on recreation <br />programs, perhaps that position is not desired because park programing is not important or <br />desired by the Council any longer. <br />Councilmember Heinrich stated that she does see value in the recreation program but struggles <br />that the City is paying a yoga instructor but now Zumba and line dancing are also offered, and <br />those instructors should then be paid. She stated that residents can obtain that service through <br />community education for a low cost. She stated that there are different additions to the <br />programing but would also like to look at participation. She referenced a recent archery event <br />where only four people signed up. She stated that she would not want to continue to offer <br />selections that residents are not participating in. She stated that while residents see value in <br />recreational programming, there should be prioritization based on the level of use. <br />Parks and Assistant Public Works Superintendent Riverblood referenced an item from the <br />Strategic Plan that speaks to finding the balance between revenue from recreational programing <br />and access. He stated that at any time a cost benefit analysis could be provided on the <br />programing. He stated that 2019 was the first full year of recreation programing with the half- <br />time position. He noted that a wide variety of programing was offered in order to determine <br />which programs would garner the most interest. He stated that the art programing for seniors <br />started out slow but has now grown to be very popular. He stated that the Zumba and line <br />dancing instructors are paid similar to the yoga instructor. He noted that sometimes instructors <br />are obtained for free. He stated that item four in the attachment to the case seeks to gain <br />consensus with what to do with the recreation program and recreation specialist position. He <br />stated that the candidate that was recommended by staff is an ideal candidate that matches well <br />with Ramsey residents and programs and services desired. He stated that he would be excited to <br />add her to the organization to backfill the now vacant position that was budgeted for in 2019. He <br />reviewed the three options presented in the attachment, noting that he would like the Council to <br />reconsider the resolution approving the hiring of the candidate. He noted that the part-time <br />recreation specialist could also provide backup to administration. He stated that the cost for the <br />position would be about $27,000 per year, which is a cost savings compared to the two interns <br />City Council Special Work Session / September 3, 2019 <br />Page 10 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.