Laserfiche WebLink
Principal City Engineer Olson inquired if the Committee would agree with Bolton and Menk <br />submitting a proposal to update the study and financial plan. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what they would be committing to. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown replied that he would not be billing the City for anything at this point. He would <br />inform the Committee of what the financial impact would be for the City to construct a water <br />treatment facility. <br /> <br />Parks/Utilities Supervisor Boos stated that all the wells in the City of Ramsey have arsenic levels <br />below the 10 parts per billion. He stated that the wells in the City of Ramsey are safe. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he had no problem with bringing back those figures. He felt it would <br />be beneficial to have the figures updated. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Public Works Committee was to recommend that Bolten & Menk prepare a <br />proposal to update the water supply and to include the financial options available to fund a water <br />treatment facility. <br /> <br />Case #8: Right of Way Ordinance Fees <br /> <br />Director of Public Works/Fire Chief Kapler stated that at the January 22, 2002 Finance <br />Committee meeting, staff presented a proposal to deal with work being done in the right of way <br />in the City of Ramsey. This proposal included both a process for obtaining permits and also <br />associated fees. The Finance Committee directed staff to review the charges to assure that <br />monies collected would cover the costs incurred if the City would need to make repairs after the <br />work in the right of way was complete. Staff contacted Anoka County Highway Department and <br />questioned their process. Anoka County charges a permit processing fee of $60, which includes <br />administrative and inspection costs. They also require a $10,000 financial surety bond from <br />contractor. The County does not differentiate between boring, vibratory plowing and open <br />trenching. They will not allow open trench cutting across county highways in most cases. Staff <br />also contacted the State DOT, but that information had not yet been received. Staff <br />recommended that the same fees and charges as presented on January 22, 2002 to cover <br />administrative fees, inspection costs and contingencies to cover damage caused by contractors. <br />Street's Supervisor Grant Riemer estimated the administrative cost of processing right of way <br />permits is equal to a minimum of one hour to his time or $75. If damage to the right of way <br />including the street should happen costs to repair would run about a minimum of $70/hour not <br />including materials. Staff is recommending that no permit would be required on County or State <br />right of ways, which would be contingent on verifying that MnDOT does have an adequate <br />permitting process. If possible all work in existing right of way would require boring, with new <br />construction trenching would be allowed. He also stated that the Committee should consider if <br />the City should charge late charges, explaining that the City had a situation along T.H. #47 where <br />trenches were left open for some time. It was staff's recommendation that a late fee be charged. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman agreed that there should be a late fee charged. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/March 19, 2002 <br /> Page 5 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />