My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 07/16/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2002
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 07/16/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:31:12 AM
Creation date
5/12/2003 2:15:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
07/16/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Principal City Engineer Olson said the date for the public hearing could be changed and <br />requested information on what the Council would like in the feasibility study. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated the feasibility report talks about the cost of doing the project; <br />the second part of the equation is how it will be paid for. He questioned how a report was sent <br />out to the citizens that shows 'costs would be paid for in a way never approved by the City <br />Council, and that they have never done. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated they would like to bring this project forward-and if they use <br />the most pessimistic approach they will fall short. They have had two smaller versions of this <br />project and proven it can pay for itself, they would like to do a larger project, it will pay for itself <br />and can be replicated throughout the City. <br /> <br />Dick Kimbler, .resident, stated they were second on the agenda and they have a lot of elderly <br />people waiting in the audience. He requested their item be discussed next. <br /> <br />City Principal City Engineer Olson explained this project would use the Water Capital Reserve <br />for future construction. It would accomplish many goals with this project and utilize the <br />dedicated source of revenue or dedicated funds that are there now and would be reimbursed upon <br />hook up. <br /> <br />Chairperson Zimmerman asked if some of this money being earmarked for this is being used by <br />the project on Juniper Ridge. <br /> <br />City Principal City Engineer Olson responded that project is not using anything from the City, <br />the only money expended on that project was $17,000 from the Storm' Water Utility and that has <br />been reimbursed already. The only money that has come from Highlands at River Park is that the <br />Storm Water Management Fund has paid for $39,000 of expenditures that were not benefiting <br />Highlands at River Park. The $21,750 was trunk fees or Storm Water Management fees that <br />were reimbursed at the time of final plat for the first addition. The City was to pay $17,250, <br />which is the difference between $39,000 and $21,750 at the time of the recording of the first <br />addition. Subsequently, the second phase has come in and more storm water money is due for <br />the final platting of the second phase than they would have had to pay for the first phase. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated he does remember when he suggested or made a motion to <br />look at this area in a comprehensive way, and he is glad they are. He stated if there are <br />precedents in the City where they have been able to subsidize projects in a beneficial way he <br />would like to know what those are. It would help him to know the dollars and cents, what the <br />projects are, and how the City achieved what they think is a good outcome. He requested that <br />figures on the other two examples be included when this comes back before the CoUncil so they <br />can make a good financial decision. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to forward this to City <br />Council based on tonight's discussion, and to receive more information. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/July 16, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.