Laserfiche WebLink
of street lights associated with the City's priority street lighting system. This system includes <br />street lights on the higher speed arterial and collector roadway at intersections with other public <br />roadways. This program was begun in the early 1990's and the City has been steadily working <br />toward its completion by adding I0 to 15 lights each year. At the present time the system is <br />comprised of lights at 146 locations with an additional 29 locations remaining to be served. <br />Recently, the Public Works Committee observed that some of the lights at tee intersections are <br />located on the wrong side of the intersection (the opposite side from that of the side street). Staff <br />has surveyed the system and found that there are 14 such locations throughout the system. A <br />listing of these locations is as follows: <br /> <br />CR 83/158th Lane <br />CSAH 5/Green Valley Road <br />CSAI-I 5/165th Lane <br />CR 56/162nd Lane <br />CR 56/Jasper Street <br />CR 56/143rd Avenue <br />CSAH 5/150th Lane <br />CR 57/144th Avenue <br />CR 57/142',d Lane <br /> <br />TH 47/CR 63 <br />TH 47/170th Lane <br />TH 47/167th Lane <br />CR 63/Wolverine <br />CR 63/Unicorn <br /> <br />Having a limited budget coupled with the need for a long term program for the completion of the <br />priority street lighting system, priority lights were installed in the most economical manner <br />available. The use of existing poles and locations nearer to transformers were less costly to <br />install. Individual lights could be relocated from the "wrong" side of the street, but at a cost that <br />would approach the installation of a light at an unlit intersection, approximately $1800 per light. <br />At this time, the Committee needs to decide whether to spend the 2002 budget to install new <br />lights, relocate existing lights, or a communication of both these options. The Committee may <br />also wish to review the street lighting policy, which has not been updated sine 1 992. I t was <br />staffs opinion that there would be more benefit to lighting unlit intersections, than to spend a <br />roughly equivalent amount to better illuminate the side street pavement at an intersection, which <br />is presently lit. The relocation of street lights located on the wrong side of the street could be <br />made a secondary priority. <br /> <br />Councitmember Anderson stated t hat a t t he intersection 1 ocated n ear h er house, t he 1 ight was <br />more effective on the wrong side of the road than the fight side of the road on T.H. #47. Now <br />that the light has been moved it sits back in the trees. She suggested that maybe the best location <br />for the lights is determined by what the function of the light is. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman inquired if there was something in the policy that identifies what <br />the function of the Street light is. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/August 19, 2002 <br /> Page 2 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />