My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 12/10/2019
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2019
>
Minutes - Council - 12/10/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 12:35:12 PM
Creation date
1/29/2020 4:08:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/10/2019
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AEON will not be able to meet the required conditions within the allotted timeframe. He noted <br /> that AEON could come back with a new proposal if desired. Mayor LeTourneau asked what would <br /> happen with the earnest money. Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the <br /> City would keep the $30,000 in earnest money if the agreement expires. Councilmember Specht <br /> asked if the delay is due to a delay in the City process. Community Development Director Gladhill <br /> explained the type of financing that AEON is competing for, which is the primary reason this <br /> project has been delayed. Mayor LeTourneau stated that the City does manage an inventory of <br /> housing stock to ensure that one housing product is not overbuilt. He noted that this project has <br /> met the inventory needs. He explained that in order to attract more retail and restaurant, the City <br /> needs to have more residents, which is what the apartment buildings are providing. He explained <br /> that without having the additional population, it will be harder for the dream of retail and <br /> restaurants to come to fruition. He noted that there has been some activity in the desire for those <br /> businesses to come to Ramsey because of the growing population. He stated that the City has a <br /> process in place where the EDA reviews these cases and a path that cases typically follow, noting <br /> that this case was not provided with that ability. He did not believe that allows the City to be <br /> ethical in respecting that process. He asked that the Council respect the integrity of the process. <br /> He asked that the case be supported as presented tonight,which will allow input from other Boards <br /> and Commissions which will lead to more meaningful discussion. Councilmember Riley stated <br /> that this agreement has already been amended twice and therefore he thought the term ethics of <br /> following the process to be an odd choice of words. Councilmember Musgrove stated that there <br /> is a desire from the community to have more retail and a concern with an increase in multi-family <br /> housing without the growth in the retail sector and therefore will support the motion as proposed <br /> to deny the extension. Councilmember Kuzma stated that this is a market driven purchase <br /> agreement that the City previously approved. He noted that the business has put$30,000 in earnest <br /> money on the property for this purchase. He recognized that there are sometimes things that <br /> happen in business that the owner cannot control and would support the extension. He noted that <br /> phase one was sold out prior to completion of construction and would think phase two would <br /> provide a similar result. He believed that the City could provide the additional six weeks and if <br /> the developer cannot meet the requirements in that time, it could be denied at that time. <br /> Councilmember Menth stated that he is against putting a roadblock in that would take away the <br /> $30,000. He asked if this would be a six-week extension. Community Development Director <br /> Gladhill explained that the six-week extension would provide the City with the ability to follow <br /> its typical process. Councilmember Specht stated that there has been a contract in place and <br /> amendments have been made and the City has worked as hard as it could to accommodate the <br /> developer. He stated that in six weeks the Council would most likely be having the same <br /> discussion. <br /> Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Heinrich, Riley, Musgrove, and Specht. Voting <br /> No: Mayor LeTourneau, Councilmembers Kuzma and Menth. <br /> 7.04: Adopt Resolution#19-264 Ordering Feasibility Report for Improvement Project#20- <br /> 02,2020 Overlay Improvements <br /> City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution#19-264 <br /> ordering a Feasibility Report for Improvement Project#20-02, 2020 Overlay Improvements. <br /> City Council/December 10,2019 <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.