My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 01/14/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:14:43 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 11:23:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/14/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
585
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AEON will not be able to meet the required conditions within the allotted timeframe. He noted <br />that AEON could come back with a new proposal if desired. Mayor LeTourneau asked what would <br />happen with the earnest money. Community Development Director Gladhill confirmed that the <br />City would keep the $30,000 in earnest money if the agreement expires. Councilmember Specht <br />asked if the delay is due to a delay in the City process. Community Development Director Gladhill <br />explained the type of financing that AEON is competing for, which is the primary reason this <br />project has been delayed. Mayor LeTourneau stated that the City does manage an inventory of <br />housing stock to ensure that one housing product is not overbuilt. He noted that this project has <br />met the inventory needs. He explained that in order to attract more retail and restaurant, the City <br />needs to have more residents, which is what the apartment buildings are providing. He explained <br />that without having the additional population, it will be harder for the dream of retail and <br />restaurants to come to fruition. He noted that there has been some activity in the desire for those <br />businesses to come to Ramsey because of the growing population. He stated that the City has a <br />process in place where the EDA reviews these cases and a path that cases typically follow, noting <br />that this case was not provided with that ability. He did not believe that allows the City to be <br />ethical in respecting that process. He asked that the Council respect the integrity of the process. <br />He asked that the case be supported as presented tonight, which will allow input from other Boards <br />and Commissions which will lead to more meaningful discussion. Councilmember Riley stated <br />that this agreement has already been amended twice and therefore he thought the term ethics of <br />following the process to be an odd choice of words. Councilmember Musgrove stated that there <br />is a desire from the community to have more retail and a concern with an increase in multi -family <br />housing without the growth in the retail sector and therefore will support the motion as proposed <br />to deny the extension. Councilmember Kuzma stated that this is a market driven purchase <br />agreement that the City previously approved. He noted that the business has put $30,000 in earnest <br />money on the property for this purchase. He recognized that there are sometimes things that <br />happen in business that the owner cannot control and would support the extension. He noted that <br />phase one was sold out prior to completion of construction and would think phase two would <br />provide a similar result. He believed that the City could provide the additional six weeks and if <br />the developer cannot meet the requirements in that time, it could be denied at that time. <br />Councilmember Menth stated that he is against putting a roadblock in that would take away the <br />$30,000. He asked if this would be a six -week extension. Community Development Director <br />Gladhill explained that the six -week extension would provide the City with the ability to follow <br />its typical process. Councilmember Specht stated that there has been a contract in place and <br />amendments have been made and the City has worked as hard as it could to accommodate the <br />developer. He stated that in six weeks the Council would most likely be having the same <br />discussion. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilmembers Heinrich, Riley, Musgrove, and Specht. Voting <br />No: Mayor LeTourneau, Councilmembers Kuzma and Menth. <br />7.04: Adopt Resolution #19-264 Ordering Feasibility Report for Improvement Project #20- <br />02, 2020 Overlay Improvements <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report and recommendation to adopt Resolution #19-264 <br />ordering a Feasibility Report for Improvement Project #20-02, 2020 Overlay Improvements. <br />City Council / December 10, 2019 <br />Page 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.