My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/28/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 01/28/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:21:22 AM
Creation date
1/30/2020 1:15:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/28/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
attempting to sell homes in another development and is having difficulty selling the single- <br />family homes but continues to sell the villa product. He commented that the villa product looks <br />like traditional single-family and those passing by cannot tell the difference. He asked the <br />Council to tour some of their other sites. Mayor LeTourneau acknowledged that it can be <br />difficult for some residents in Ramsey to picture the villa product as they are used to larger lots. <br />He acknowledged that the developer is stating that there is a high demand for the villa product. <br />Mr. Brown confirmed that they continue to sell out their villa product while single family homes <br />across the street from this site continue to remain vacant. Councilmember Musgrove stated that <br />she supports this product as it is a method to provide density and fill the desire in the market <br />without building additional apartments in The COR. Mr. Brown commented that the majority of <br />the villa lots are in the 60s for lot width and would look the same as the single-family homes in <br />Riverstone. Councilmember Menth asked if approving this tonight would eliminate the ability to <br />discuss a possible road connectivity. Mr. Brown stated that he would be willing to continue <br />discussions with Riverstone but did not believe that there would be a benefit in connecting the <br />communities. Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that staff could discuss that option with <br />Capstone Homes but noted that it was quite a bit of work to provide the utility connection <br />between the two properties. He stated that the request could be brought forward to Capstone. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the connectivity could be a bike trail or path or would solely <br />apply to a roadway. Councilmember Menth commented on the difficulty of navigating areas <br />with standalone roadways. He used the example of Highway 10, where the neighborhoods are <br />standalone and therefore do not provide a cut through option for passing traffic. He noted that <br />this would be similar, requiring vehicles to use Alpine. Councilmember Specht stated that he <br />prefers not having the connection as it makes the neighborhood safer and eliminates cut through <br />traffic. He agreed that this plan could be a good alternative to an apartment building but would <br />still provide a desired product in the housing market. Mr. Brown commented that there is a <br />demand for the villa product and the price point as the larger lot single-family homes price out a <br />large portion of the market. He stated that the development on the north side of Alpine has <br />remained since 2016 and there is difficultly selling. Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated <br />that the lots on the north side of Alpine are two acre lots with septic and well, and therefore not <br />the same as the single-family lots proposed with this development. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor LeTourneau, Councilmembers Specht, Musgrove, and <br />Kuzma. Voting No: Councilmembers Heinrich, Menth, and Riley. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill noted that this would be contingent upon the draft <br />Comprehensive Plan being approved as well. <br />7.03: Professional Services Contract Amendment for the Tinklenberg Group <br />City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report and recommendation to consider the <br />proposed contract amendment to adjust the fees. The alternative direction the Council may take <br />includes keeping the fee at the current $3,300 per month (or another number negotiated) and <br />asking the consultant to adjust the expected effort proportionately. This alternative may result in <br />a loss of momentum toward the accomplishment of the stated goals. Consequently, amendment <br />of the contract to reflect the expected effort is recommended at this time. <br />City Council / January 14, 2020 <br />Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.