Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Musgrove stated that there was previous discussion related to receiving updates. <br />She stated that while the Council has received some written updates, she would like to receive <br />more specific information. She noted that she would also like to hear additional details on what <br />the increase would entail. <br />Elwyn Tinklenberg, The Tinklenberg Group, explained that the previous contract amount has <br />remained consistent for the past several years and includes the preparation phase. He stated that <br />the work thus far included a lot of the preparation, events that involve legislators that occur prior <br />to the session beginning, along with meetings with legislators. He stated that this year will be a <br />critical funding opportunity for Highway 10. He stated that it is clear that there will not be a <br />major effort in terms of a transportation increase and therefore the funding would most likely be <br />bonding that would be allocated to transportation, which requires more work and often occurs at <br />the very end of the session. He stated that the House Transportation Committee is going to be in <br />Ramsey tomorrow and thanked Councilmember Heinrich for her efforts. He highlighted other <br />upcoming events and meetings. He stated that the change will be that during the session there <br />are so many conversations that must be engaged and tracked and the City will be working with <br />the County on a larger scale. He stated that they want to make sure that in all conversations the <br />third lane project and the two Ramsey projects are brought up together, which requires a great <br />level of detail. He stated that he would also organize a Day on the Hill, which would help to <br />create awareness and priority. He stated that they have been successful in creating an <br />environmental that will lead to a good opportunity in this session. <br />Councilmember Heinrich thanked Mr. Tinklenberg for his work on Highway 10. She stated that <br />she has benefited and learned from Mr. Tinklenberg, noting that he represents the City well. She <br />stated that at the end of the day she has to answer to the taxpayer. She asked if there would be a <br />level of work that would not continue if the increase is not awarded. <br />Mr. Tinklenberg commented that he would not do that. He stated that Ramsey has asked him to <br />only have one municipal client, and he obliged. He stated that he wants to see this completed <br />and is proud of the relationship he has with Ramsey and is proud to represent Ramsey as he <br />believes that this is a critically important project not just for Ramsey but for a larger regional <br />area. He stated that he brought forward this request as there would be a much larger level of <br />effort on his part, and others on City staff during this session. He stated that there is a lot of <br />opportunity for confusion during that process and wants to ensure that does not happen. He <br />recognized that his statement was not in his best interest, but he is committed to the City and this <br />effort. <br />Councilmember Heinrich asked if Mr. Tinklenberg is also contracted by Anoka County. She <br />asked how long the rate has remained at $3,300 a month. <br />Mr. Tinklenberg commented that his rate has remained at that rate for the past three years, <br />unchanged. He clarified that he does not contract for Anoka County. He explained that his job <br />is to represent the City of Ramsey and ensure that Ramsey's interests are a part of the discussion <br />as the County has stated that the third lane is its top priority. He believed that there is an <br />opportunity for both options to be successful. <br />City Council / January 14, 2020 <br />Page 13 of 16 <br />