Laserfiche WebLink
CC Work Session 2. 1. <br />Meeting Date: 02/11/2020 <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Receive Update on Riverstone Preliminary Plat (Master Plan) and Discuss Puma Street Reconstruction Options <br />Purpose/Background: <br />The purpose of this case is to receive an update on the overall development plan for the Riverstone neighborhood <br />developed by Capstone Homes. <br />• Changes to housing type in NE quadrant (reduction in density and total number of units/removal of planned <br />attached units) <br />• Purpose and Need for Puma Street Reconstruction <br />Primary Policy Question - Focus of This Discussion <br />• Does the City feel reconstruction of Puma Street is necessary? <br />. If yes to above, is a City Contribution to the cost of this collector road serving multiple residential <br />neighborhoods and business districts appropriate? <br />This is intended to be a very high-level policy discussion. The purpose of this case is not intended to be an <br />exhaustive nor detailed development review. The more detailed analysis will come with future steps. The Planning <br />Commission is asked to weigh in on the need for improvements based on past traffic studies and public input. The <br />City Council is asked to weigh in on the same plus the concept of a City contribution to the costs of this <br />improvement. <br />Attached to this case is a copy of the case presented to the Planning Commission at their February 6 Planning <br />Commission Meeting. This will serve as the background for the update to the master plan. This is intended as an <br />update only at this time. The City has already approved the Preliminary Plat for Riverstone, giving the Developer <br />certain entitlements to proceed with this project. The proposed revisions are a reduction in development intensity. <br />A majority of this case is intended to be a high-level policy discussion on the purpose and need to reconstruction <br />Puma Street and highlight potential funding sources. Staff believes that upgrades to Puma Street are warranted and <br />necessary based on past traffic studies and public input. In recent years, at least two major initiatives (Bunker Lake <br />Industrial Park Infrastructure Study and Riverstone Environmental Assessment Worksheet [EAW]) resulted in <br />traffic studies confirming the need to improve capacity on Puma Street and intersection improvements along Alpine <br />Drive. These studies are not attached to this case but available upon request. <br />Additionally, the primary concern raised by the Public with multiple development proposals along Alpine Drive in <br />this area has been traffic safety and capacity concerns. <br />As noted above, the intent of this case is to seek broad policy direction on the need for improvements to Puma <br />Street and subsequently the desire of the City to contribute to the costs of this improvement. The following <br />information is provided as background only. It is not the intent of this case to dive into this level of detail. Staff will <br />be forwarding a case to the February 18 Public Works Committee to begin a more detailed review of this topic. <br />Potential funding sources for the potential City contribution include, but are not necessarily limited to the <br />following: <br />1. City's Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund (generated from local property tax revenue) <br />2. Anoka County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (ACHRA) <br />3. State of Minnesota Municipal State Aid (MSA) Account <br />