My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 04/12/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:47:09 PM
Creation date
4/8/2005 3:21:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/12/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
461
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Norman noted under Goal//8 "Create a Technology Plan - go back to Goal #1 - sub-number <br />4: I';nsurc the availability of "state of the art" telecommunications for all of the RTC, including <br />Tiors II and l II. That should be added under #8 for City operations and public safety. <br /> <br />Ms. Nelson commented that one of those items dealt with the community more broadly. <br /> <br />(iouncJlmcmber Strommen suggested that the three bullets in Goal #8 should be above the <br />specific Performance Focus Points. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey suggested wrapping the three bullet points into Performance Points. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec inquired if we should be looking at any others that we may have left out. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook asked would it help to have a consensus on the eight goals and then we <br />can move into the bullet points? <br /> <br />Mr. Norman replied that this is not ready for the agenda - we need to bring it back to the Council <br />[::)r more discussion. <br /> <br />3) Urban Village Tours <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that three and a half years ago some of us went on a tour of <br />t'our communities in North Chicago. We came away very energized and excited about it. <br />Recently, there have been discussions of the possibility of touring other sites in other areas of the <br />Country. We could do a virtual tour or we could send a couple of representatives. We could talk <br />about who sboulcl go. <br /> <br />Councilmembcr Elvig didn't know ifa virtual tour was a good way to do this. <br /> <br />Mr. Norman stated that staff has some pictures from a development in the Los Angeles, <br />Calil~ornia area and also some in the Phoenix, Arizona area. He recommended Council and staff <br />look at these and discuss what we want to do. He reiterated that a virtual tour could be done or a <br />couple o/' Council representatives could visit the developments. He added that next week <br />Council will be having a discussion relating to the China Sister-City item. Maybe those who <br />want to go to China do that and we could send the other Councilmembers to the developments in <br />(;alifornia and Arizona. Those who attended the tours could come back with a video and make a <br />presentation at a work session. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Strommen stated that one thing she likes about a virtual tour is all the things you <br />can see. She talked some about the Arbor Lakes development in Maple Grove and suggested <br />lhat it is not a practical development for Minnesota winter weather. <br /> <br />Councilmcmber Cook stated that Chicago was similar to us in weather and suburb types. <br /> <br />Councihncmber Elvig mentioned another development just outside of Denver, Colorado <br />(Staplcton). lie suggested it is an outstanding project and it is certainly in a winter climate. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session - February 28, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.