Laserfiche WebLink
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, 1:03 PM Joseph J. Langel <jj1(aratwiklaw.com> wrote: <br />Michael and Sara St. Clair, <br />I am responding to a request for information you made by phone to Chloe McGuire Brigl this morning. <br />With respect to the easement, the southerly 33 feet of your property has been subject to an easement for <br />roadway purposes since some time prior to 1977. While the City has the right to use the recorded easement for <br />road purposes, it has not done so. The portion of 148th Street that lies within the easement upon your property <br />has never been improved or maintained as a public road or opened to the public as such. <br />With respect to the complaint, there was a formal complaint filed against you on July 1, 2019 for the home - <br />based business. City Staff has since worked with the you to get a draft administrative home occupation permit <br />for the landscape business, though the permit has not been formalized or signed by the City or you. <br />Let me know if you need any additional information. <br />Joe <br />Joseph J. Langel <br />Ratwik, Roszak & Maloney, P.A. <br />730 Second Ave. South, Suite 300 <br />Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br />PH: 612-339-0060 Direct Fax: 612-225-6860 <br />Web: www.ratwiklaw.com <br />1 <br />