Laserfiche WebLink
From: Matt Kuker <br />To: Tim Gladhill <br />Subject: Off premise signage request <br />Date: Friday, January 31, 2020 12:27:53 PM <br />Tim, as well as, City of Ramsey Planning and Zoning Commission: <br />This email is being sent to express our concern and position regarding the request of the pylon sign West of <br />Armstrong Blvd. The City of Ramsey has always required that all signage that is associated with a private <br />development being on its premise. <br />The applicant has purchased property that is further removed from Hwy 10 to develop, and now is attempting to <br />have that properties signage closer to Hwy 10 than it's on site location. <br />As you know, PSD is currently constructing (nearing completion) a 15,000 sq ft retail mall which also will be <br />utilizing a pylon sign, our pylon will be on premise. By granting this applicant permission, you will have 2 pylon <br />signs adjacent to each other, which will create confusion of which business is located on that premises. This sign <br />will not be cohesive with current sign restrictions and ordinances. <br />If the applicant wanted a sign to be located right on Hwy 10 he should have purchased property on Hwy 10, it is that <br />simple. We have a $2M investment that will be adversely affected if this application is approved. <br />This also sets a precedent, if this is approved by the City, you should be ready for a wave of off -premise sign <br />requests. We plead that you continue to require all signage (for all properties) to be on premise. If approved this <br />will negatively affect the entire Hwy 10 coordinator in Ramsey, for now and years to come. <br />Sincerely, <br />Matt Kuker <br />COO <br />PSD, LLC <br />Sent from my iPhone <br />