Laserfiche WebLink
Chairperson Kuzma asked the condition of the roads within Business Park 95 and Regency <br />Ponds. <br />Councilmember Menth asked the paser rating of Business Park compared to the other roadways <br />originally included in the project. <br />City Engineer Westby confirmed that the roads in Business Park 95 are in poor condition and <br />provided photographs. He provided the different paser ratings. He explained that option three <br />would be most cost effective with the limited funds the City has. <br />Councilmember Riley stated that the City previously identified what it thought was the best idea, <br />but it was found that the pavement was not conducive to the proposed improvement. He stated <br />that it also appears that the priority has changed, and the recommendation better fits the change <br />in priority because of the limited funding available. <br />Chairperson Kuzma agreed that repairing 2.8 miles would be a better choice than 1.5 miles. <br />Councilmember Menth stated that his concern would be that the Feasibility Report is not <br />completed on the recommended roads and therefore it could be unknown as to the pavement <br />thickness. <br />City Engineer Westby explained that the roads in Business Park 95 should have been built to a <br />higher standard, and that the roads in Regency Ponds have good PASER ratings and were more <br />recently constructed and therefore should have a sufficient pavement section to allow for a 2- <br />inch mill and overlay. However, he noted pavement coring's would be needed to verify this as <br />part of the Feasibility Study process. <br />City Administrator Ulrich asked how the cost could be impacted by the change in the schedule. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that overlay plans do not take as long to prepare as reconstruction <br />plans and reviewed the proposed schedule and how that would be impacted by changing <br />roadways proposed for improvement. He stated that there would be a two to three week increase <br />in schedule if the streets are changed. <br />Chairperson Kuzma stated that he would support the staff recommendation. <br />Motion by Councilmember Menth, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to recommend City <br />Council acceptance of the Feasibility Report for the 2020 Pavement Overlay Improvements, <br />Improvement Project No. 20-02, and to recommend that a new Feasibility Report be ordered <br />including the streets of Business Park 95 and Regency Ponds 1st 2nd and 3rd Additions. <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Riley asked if the other roadways would continue to be <br />maintained. City Engineer Westby stated that staff understands that the other roads were <br />included in the CIP for this year and are not in good condition. He confirmed that continued <br />maintenance would occur. He stated that the collection of additional GPR data will allow staff to <br />Public Works Committee / February 18, 2020 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />