Laserfiche WebLink
Board Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br />RESOLUTION #00 -04 -077 <br />A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0513 RELATING TO A <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM STREET FRONTAGE OR LOT WIDTH <br />REQUIREMENTS <br />WHEREAS, Larry Skogquist, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant ", have properly <br />applied for a Board of Adjustment Variance from the minimum lot width requirement established <br />in Section 9.20.11 of the Ramsey City Code in order to construct a dwelling on the following <br />legally described property: <br />The west 475.2 feet of the east 650 feet of the south 275 feet of the north 575 feet of the <br />Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 32, Range 25 (as <br />measured along the North and East Lines thereof); except the road; subject to easement of <br />record. <br />( "Subject Property ") <br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br />OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br />1. That the Applicants appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to <br />Section 9.03.05 of the Ramsey City Code on April 4, 2000, and that said public hearing was <br />properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated a part <br />of these findings by reference. <br />2. That the Subject Property is zoned R -1 Rural Residential and is approximately 3 acres in <br />size. <br />3. That the Subject Property is surrounded by R -1 Rural Residential zoning. <br />4. That Section 9.11.01 of the Ramsey City Code states that no lot shall contain any building <br />used as a dwelling unless it has the minimum lot width; Section 9.20.11 states that the <br />minimum lot width in the Rural Residential District is 200 feet; Section 9.02 defines lot <br />width as the width measured at the property line abutting the street and in no case shall street <br />frontages in the Rural area be less than 200 feet. <br />5. That the Applicants are proposing that a single family dwelling be constructed on the Subject <br />Property. <br />6. That the Subject Property is landlocked and has no frontage' on a public road and the literal <br />• <br />interpretation of City Code Section 9.11.01 would prohibit the development of a single <br />