Resolution - #00-02-036 - 02/08/2000

Home

• Councilmember Connolly introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: ( "Subject Property ") RESOLUTION #00 -02 -036 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0509 RELATING TO A REQUEST FROM DONALD KVETON FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MAINTAIN A SECOND MAIN BUILDING ON A PARCEL WHEREAS, the City of Ramsey received an application from Donald Kveton for a conditional use permit to maintain a main building on the property generally known as 5750 177` Avenue N.W. and legally described as follows: Lot 3, Block 1, ECHO RIDGE, Anoka County, Minnesota NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THIS CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA that the findings of fact relating to the request are determined to be as follows: 1. That on December 20, 1999, Donald Kveton, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," properly applied for a conditional use permit to maintain a second main building (dwelling) on the Subject Property. 2. That the applicant appeared before the Ramsey Planning Commission for a public hearing pursuant to Section 9.03.04 of the City Code on January 4, 2000, and that said public hearing was properly advertised, and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated as a part of these findings by reference. 3. That the Subject Property is 35 acres in size. 4. That the Subject Property and surrounding parcels are zoned R -1 Rural Residential and located in the Rural Service area for which density is restricted to 4 units in 40 acres. 5. That Section 9.11.01 (General Requirements) of City Code states that there shall not be more than one main building on a lot except as otherwise provided. 6. That the City Council reaffirms the necessity of maintaining the City Code Section 9.11.01 providing that there shall be no more than one main building on a lot" as said section is an important part of the City's planning and zoning regulations generally intended to benefit the health and welfare of the community and because of this finding, the City generally opposes granting variances to this requirement of City Code Section 9.11.0.