Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />• <br />7. That because of the unique circumstances by which the second home was built on the <br />Subject Property, the Council deems it responsible to grant a conditional use permit to the <br />second dwelling, however, the City Council may reject any attempt to use this conditional <br />use permit approval as a precedent to avoid the requirements of Section 9.11.01 in the <br />future. <br />8. That the Applicant's dwelling on the Subject Property is considered to be the main building <br />and the Applicant is requesting a second main building or dwelling to provide separate <br />living quarters for the caretakers of the Echo Ridge Farm estate. <br />9. That Section 9.11.20 establishes a 768 square foot minimum house size for ramblers with <br />garages at least 440 square feet in size. <br />10. That the second dwelling requested is a 1,008 square foot rambler with a 576 square foot <br />attached garage. <br />11. That the second dwelling on the 35 acre estate does not violate the 4 units in 40 acres <br />density restriction in the Rural Service Area. <br />12. That the Applicant has stated an interest in developing the Subject Property as a personal <br />estate and is not interested in subdividing and developing the property; therefore, the <br />Applicant applied for a conditional use permit rather than a subdivision in order to provide <br />separate living quarters for the caretakers. <br />13. That there is a sufficient distance between the Applicant's dwelling and the caretaker <br />dwelling to facilitate a subdivision that will meet structure setback requirements. <br />14. That the addition of the second dwelling will not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br />15. That the second dwelling will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br />residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br />16. That the second dwelling will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or <br />market value of any surrounding property. <br />17. That the second dwelling will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future <br />neighboring uses. <br />18. That the second dwelling will be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br />highways and streets. <br />19. That the second dwelling will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost <br />for public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of <br />the community. <br />RESOLUTION #00 -02 -036 <br />Paget of <br />