My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/26/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2020
>
Agenda - Council - 05/26/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:49:10 PM
Creation date
5/27/2020 9:08:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/26/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
536
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Schmidt stated that they are not opposed to spending additional time discussing but would not <br />want to see an indefinite tabling of the request. He confirmed that they are open to continued <br />discussions but would want to get a vote at some point. <br />Chairperson Bauer explained that if the City does not take action after the 60-day extension, the <br />request would automatically be approved, which prevents the issue of indefinite tabling. <br />Mr. Schmidt commented that staff has been professional, and they appreciate the time they have <br />been given tonight and looks forward to continuing discussions. <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to close the public hearing. <br />A roll call vote was performed by the Deputy City Administrator: <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Commissioner Johnson aye <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Motion carried. <br />Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 10:06 p.m. <br />Commission Business <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that if the Commission tables the request, staff would <br />still appreciate direction as to whether there is an appetite towards a mix of lot sizes. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that if the Commission feels that 80-foot lots would be the choice, that <br />recommendation should be made tonight. He stated that if the Commission is open to a mix of <br />lots, that direction should be provided along with additional elements for the developer and staff <br />to work on. <br />Commissioner Anderson stated that the City worked hard on the draft Comprehensive Plan and <br />would not support anything other than 80-foot lots as anything else would not support the character <br />of the neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the Brookfield development has only 80-foot lots. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl confirmed that Brookfield has 80-foot lots. <br />Planning Commission/ May 7, 2020 <br />Page 13 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.