Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Musgrove referenced the comment made by a resident that density ranges from <br />denser in The COR and then moves towards wider lots as you go out from there. She stated that <br />she would also support 80-foot lots. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if Councilmember Musgrove is speaking as a member of the <br />Council or whether that is her personal opinion. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that is her personal opinion. She stated that the Council has had <br />recent discussion related to housing and density. She stated that her comment was not meant to <br />sway the Commission but felt that was an important comment made by the residents. <br />Commissioner VanScoy echoed the comment that there was a lot of intent in developing the draft <br />Comprehensive Plan and zoning in order to support a transition in zoning. He stated that he would <br />support the 80-foot lot size and would not support smaller lot sizes on the property. <br />Commissioner Gengler stated that she is open to smaller lots sizes in the development. She <br />understands the intent of the zoning but feels like there have been some changes to what consumers <br />desire in the housing market. She stated that it does not seem that 80-foot lots are as popular as <br />they once may have been. She stated that she understands the idea of changing a neighborhood is <br />scary and therefore would support the idea of surveying residents to gather additional input and <br />clarify some misunderstanding that may exist. She stated that perhaps the 55 lots against Variolite <br />would be an issue and would encourage 80-foot lots and buffering in that area. <br />Commissioner Peters stated that he lives in Brookfield, noting that the previously existing <br />homeowners' association has been disestablished. He stated that he has lived in a range of housing <br />products and in different areas and therefore has a wide understanding of different living <br />arrangements. He commented that some people desire different things. He stated that sometimes <br />an 80-foot lot is more than some people can handle and maintain. He commented that you are not <br />able to pick your neighbors and sometimes smaller lots are easier for some to maintain in a well - <br />kept manner. He stated that perhaps a single parent desires a smaller lot with less maintenance. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated that he finds himself in a position of compromise quite a bit and <br />supports the element of affordable housing. He stated that the more different the people around <br />you are, the better person you ultimately become. He stated that to say that a home valued at <br />$350,000 is low income housing is absurd and it is helpful to have variety in housing. He <br />commented that he does not believe that an R-2 zoning would be appropriate but would continue <br />to support R-1 zoning. He commented that he wants to see the park and other elements remain. <br />He stated that he would love to see a compromise to bring diversity to the development. <br />Chairperson Bauer clarified that R-1 villas would support 65-foot lots, rather than the 55-foot lots <br />supported by R-2. <br />Commissioner Woestehoff encouraged the Commission to remember that a lot of time has been <br />spent on this case and he would encourage a decision rather than tabling. <br />Planning Commission/ May 7, 2020 <br />Page 14 of 21 <br />