My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/05/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2001
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 06/05/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/20/2025 2:09:11 PM
Creation date
5/14/2003 8:54:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/05/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Denise Albrecht, 5313 143ra Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that her main concern has to do with <br />traffic. Speeding along Dysprosium is very bad and it will only get worse with the proposed <br />development. <br /> <br />Ron Cerwinske, 14540 Junkite, Ramsey, stated that one of the holding ponds are proposed to be <br />behind his house and yet further south of his property is low land. He did not understand why <br />the pond could not be located in that location. Mr. Cerwinske reviewed the area for the <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Sarah Strommen, 14546 Krypton Street, Ramsey, stated that there are very unique assets in these <br />neighborhoods. It was because of the trees and ponds that they chose to move into Ramsey. She <br />stated that it was her understanding that the Park Commission was considering cash in lieu of <br />green space, which she did not think was a good decision. Her other concern had to do with the <br />health of the wetlands once the development occurs. She explained that the development is just <br />under the threshold of needing an environmental assessment, which she strongly urged the City <br />to complete before approving the development. <br /> <br />Stacy Dresel, 14540 Iodine Street, Ramsey, stated that three are several children that live along <br />Iodine Street and she has a problem with the statement that was made regarding the additional <br />five to ten more cars going through their neighborhood because of the development. She felt that <br />that number would be much higher. <br /> <br />Beth Alto, 5540 145th Circle, Ramsey, stated that the corner of her lot would be impacted by the <br />townhome development. She explained that she moved into a single family home development <br />so that she could be by single family homes and having that many townhomes next to her <br />concerns her. Ms. Alto stated that she specifically bought their lot because it was flat and did not <br />have water around it and now they are proposing a drainage pond behind her house and she has <br />several small children. She expressed concern over the lack of green space being proposed as <br />part of the townhome development. She also noted that she felt that traffic would increase <br />dramatically along Iodine Street where there are a lot of young children. <br /> <br />Bruce Iverson, 14301 Neon Street, Ramsey, stated that he owns the property directly across from <br />the peninsula. He stated that his primary concerns have to do with the environmental impact the <br />development will have on the area. He encouraged the Commission to assess the properties that <br />currently abut the wetlands because most of those lots average in size from 3A acre to 1 ½ acres in <br />size. When the developers speaks of tree preservation it will be challenging to do so on a ¼ acre <br />to ½ acre lot. He stated that he understands that development will happen in the area, but thinks <br />that the City has a great opportunity to control the size of the lots along the wetlands. He stated <br />that it is not possible to place a house of today's values on a ¼ acre lot and preserve trees. Mr. <br />Iverson suggested that the City require a percentage of trees be preserved as well as requiring <br />certain setbacks. He also recommended that an environmental assessment be done as part of the <br />development. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 5, 2001 <br /> Page 12 of 28 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.