Agenda - Council - 05/10/2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case #4: Request for an Interim Use Permit; Case of Robert Guzzo Community Development Director Trudgeon explained the City has received an application from. Robert Guzzo, who resides at 6160 Green Valley Road' NW, requesting an interim use permit to operate a sign business in a detached accessory structure on his property. Mr. Guzzo, along with two non-resident partners, currently operates a sign business in a detached accessory structure on his property. There is also non non-resident employee. Mr. Guzzo's parcel is roughly 8.34 acres in size and thus would be eligible to apply fora home a maximum of two non-resident employees. Mr. resident employees and therefore, he has exceeded the Community Development Director Trudgeon permit to continue to operate the sign busine: prior to that time, the business flourishes enou consists ot"manufacturing signs on site via mig off~site. He explained while the application is for occupation permit are being used to evaluate this the home occupation ordinance, are not to exceed 16 trips within a 24 hour period; a 25 gaitqs access from a County, State, or definition. There would be three round trip during the day. truck deliveries, but the frequency maximum, it could be up to three t~es a trips, during a standard day, of aboUt ten. o1: '~ermit, but would be limited to do not count as non- occupation permit. ~lied for an interim use hope that business them for a home traffic trips, as outlined in business day or if the property qualifies under this and evening with an additional occasionally receive large ~ending on the workload (at a is an average number of vehicle during standard business hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 .p.~i;i':'Monday does not receive clients at the Community Development Dir~6~ T~dgeon advised the Planning Commission held a public hearing an~t! rewieW~d'the-request hf::~O~7.XPdt 7, 2005 meeting. Several residents voiced their concerns reg~Ming:~amo~t of tra~(~hted by this business along Green Valley Road. He Ndicated both staff.'~d '~e Pla~ng':Commission have c0ncems regarding this ~e of operation in a residential arem:. ~le the prope~ is more th~ eight acres in size, a large potion o~ it is located within the flo'~'.~gy of Ford Brook, deeming much of the land as unbuildable. ~us, both the house and acceSgb~ structure are vew ne~ Green Valley Road, creating a much smaller feel to ~e prope~..' F~he~ore, the constraints of the prope~ make it difficult to recmve large' ~ck. deliveries:and)to comply with the off-street p~king regulations of Ci~ Code. He advised StaWs: inclinatiOn.was to deny this request. The Pla~ing Commission a~eed that this type of use is n°t apP~;P~ia{e for a commerciagresidential area. However, in order to allow the applicant time to relocate the business to a commercial/industrial area, the Pla~ing Commission is recommending approving the request for an interim use pemit for six months. The Planning Commission requested that an additional te~ be included in the pe~it stating that ~he applicant acknowledges that he cabot apply for an extension. The Ci~ A~omey has advised :<afl not to include this term in the pe~it. City Council/April 26, 2005 Page 8 of 23 -181-