My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Charter Commission - 08/27/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Charter Commission
>
2020
>
Agenda - Charter Commission - 08/27/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:13:50 PM
Creation date
8/25/2020 10:21:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
08/27/2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Heights collects a special revenue from their landfill agreement. All cities use state MSAS funds <br />where possible. <br />Table 2: Funding Matrix <br />Property <br />Taxes <br />Special <br />Assessments <br />Capital <br />Bonds <br />Franchise <br />Fees <br />Other <br />Mechanisms <br />Coon Rapids <br />X <br />X <br />Brooklyn Park <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Inver Grove <br />Heights <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Elk River <br />X <br />X <br />White Bear <br />Lake <br />X <br />X <br />New Hope <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Eagan <br />X <br />X <br />Stillwater <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Table 3: Funding Technique Usage Discussion: <br />Technique <br />Usage Summary <br />Franchise <br />Multiple cities reported that franchise fees are used to address local road funding <br />Fees <br />needs. Some cities used franchise fees as a supplement to other funding sources, <br />while some use them as the primary source of funding. Most of the cities that have <br />franchise fees enacted them in the last decade. Flat fee franchise fees are the most <br />common. Cities' rationale for this funding mechanism was due to the way to <br />disperse low burden equally among residents. The use of the flat fee also insured <br />predictable costs for residents. <br />Special <br />Assessments were a common way for cities in our sample to allocate a portion of <br />Assessments <br />total costs of road funding to the properties that directly benefit from the <br />improvements. The majority of cities in our sample are limiting the extent to <br />which they use special assessments, so as not to overly burden property owners. <br />On the other hand, two cities (Cities 7 and 8) use special assessments more <br />aggressively and have comparatively high assessment rates. Cities rationale for <br />special assessments was typically based on the benefits received principle. <br />Another reason is that Minnesota state statute requires cities to assess at least 20% <br />of the cost of a project when using public bonds. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.