Laserfiche WebLink
Heights collects a special revenue from their landfill agreement. All cities use state MSAS funds <br />where possible. <br />Table 2: Funding Matrix <br />Property <br />Taxes <br />Special <br />Assessments <br />Capital <br />Bonds <br />Franchise <br />Fees <br />Other <br />Mechanisms <br />Coon Rapids <br />X <br />X <br />Brooklyn Park <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Inver Grove <br />Heights <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Elk River <br />X <br />X <br />White Bear <br />Lake <br />X <br />X <br />New Hope <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Eagan <br />X <br />X <br />Stillwater <br />X <br />X <br />X <br />Table 3: Funding Technique Usage Discussion: <br />Technique <br />Usage Summary <br />Franchise <br />Multiple cities reported that franchise fees are used to address local road funding <br />Fees <br />needs. Some cities used franchise fees as a supplement to other funding sources, <br />while some use them as the primary source of funding. Most of the cities that have <br />franchise fees enacted them in the last decade. Flat fee franchise fees are the most <br />common. Cities' rationale for this funding mechanism was due to the way to <br />disperse low burden equally among residents. The use of the flat fee also insured <br />predictable costs for residents. <br />Special <br />Assessments were a common way for cities in our sample to allocate a portion of <br />Assessments <br />total costs of road funding to the properties that directly benefit from the <br />improvements. The majority of cities in our sample are limiting the extent to <br />which they use special assessments, so as not to overly burden property owners. <br />On the other hand, two cities (Cities 7 and 8) use special assessments more <br />aggressively and have comparatively high assessment rates. Cities rationale for <br />special assessments was typically based on the benefits received principle. <br />Another reason is that Minnesota state statute requires cities to assess at least 20% <br />of the cost of a project when using public bonds. <br />11 <br />