Laserfiche WebLink
Property Tax <br />Property taxes are a common way for cities to raise general revenue. Most cities <br />within our sample use property tax revenue as a way to fund their road projects. <br />Property taxes are a reliable source of revenue however largely inadequate to <br />cover total road funding costs, dependent on short term priorities, and politically <br />unpopular. <br />Bonds <br />Bonds are a popular method to fund road infrastructure projects in our city pool. <br />Most cities used bonds as a supplemental, not primary, income source. The <br />interest incurred by bonds often places future burden on property tax funds, which <br />are used to pay the interest. <br />Other sources <br />The most common other source that cities in our sample used were MSAS funds. <br />All of the cities in our sample were eligible to designate up to 20% of their roads <br />for MSAS funds. Other funding sources also included national grants, <br />international funding, the Local Road Improvement Fund, and Host Community <br />Funds (fees for using a city's landfill). <br />Given our findings, the City of Ramsey is well situated in their current reliance on special <br />assessments for approximately 25% of projects and we would not recommend increasing this, as <br />cities have expressed overall interest in keeping these rates at this level. Multiple cities have <br />appreciated the diversification, stability, and flexibility offered by franchise fees. Though we did <br />not hear of any cities having trouble with introducing the fee politically, we did hear from <br />numerous sources that there is a high level of importance placed on public engagement efforts. <br />Additionally, our interview with the League of Minnesota Cities representative mentioned concern <br />of growing political unpopularity of franchise fees. Partnership with League of Minnesota Cities <br />and other cities that have successfully passed the franchise fee would be a useful tool as the City <br />of Ramsey considers the political feasibility of passing franchise fees. <br />Innovative funding techniques <br />Interviewees also discussed several innovative funding techniques that they are interested in seeing <br />added to Minnesota municipalities road funding toolbox. The policies - street improvement <br />districts and a city wheelage tax - would help to expand the ability of cities to raise dedicated road <br />maintenance revenue. Street improvement districts would grant cities the authority to collect fees <br />from property owners within established districts to fund road maintenance projects, similar to the <br />State's storm sewer improvement districts. Legislation for the funding tool passed the Minnesota <br />House in February 2020 (HF 1095) but its companion has not yet been scheduled for a hearing in <br />the Minnesota Senate (SF 1271) (League of Minnesota Cities, 2020). The wheel tax policy would <br />allow Minnesota city to receive wheelage tax revenue. Currently, the wheelage tax authority lies <br />with Minnesota Counties, but the proposed legislation would enable a $10 surcharge on license <br />tab and title transfers to be applied back to cities. The legislation has been introduced in both the <br />Minnesota House and Senate however to this date no further actions have been taken. <br />Importance of public opinion <br />Many of the cities that were interviewed and surveyed discussed the particular methods they use <br />to engage the public and secure support for road improvement funding mechanisms. Considering <br />the previous unsuccessful attempt to pass franchise fees in Ramsey in 2019, the city may find <br />12 <br />