My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/12/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2005
>
Minutes - Council - 04/12/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 1:47:24 PM
Creation date
5/13/2005 8:34:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Zactsch inquired where the wetlands would be replaced and whether acquisition would be <br />required [hr the replacement. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the action tonight will begin the design for the <br />sewer, and these details will be answered during the process of the design work. There will be <br />land acquisition necessary, which has been known from the beginning. If there is mitigation <br />required they generally try to mitigate within the existing wetland that is being impacted. This <br />will be determined as the project is designed. <br /> <br />Mr. Zaetsch inquired about the Chapter 8 impact and who the affected parties along the right-of- <br />Wa y a <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied Chapter 8 of the City Charter relates to public improvements and <br />the specific assessment procedure the City uses when it undertakes to establish a special <br />assessment project. It has details outlined of what is necessary for the City to undertake a public <br />improvement pro. ject. The first step is to order a feasibility report. The City is a considerable <br />di stance fl'om having a feasibility report prepared to go forward with this project. The first thing <br />would be a public hearing and it would then be considered whether to go forward with the <br />prt),ject. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson indicated the feasibility study has been requested and is <br />in draft t'orm. It has not been accepted by the City Council because there are issues relative to <br />where thc pipe will go and how much it will cost. The feasibility study <br /> <br />Mr. Zaetsch stated he has the same questions relating to Case Nos. 9 and 10. <br /> <br />Couneihnember Elvig stated this is not the project that is on the books, and they are not planning <br />t)n building the sewer pipe now. They are looking at how the sewer run might be, what costs <br />would be involved, and how it would impact different people. The City may not fund this; it <br />could be funded by a developer. It should be understood that this is part of a long process and <br />this is .ju.fit one step to see if they can move forward. He asked if some of this route would go into <br />Ibc county ditch. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied there is a small segment in the northeast comer <br />that goes in the county ditch. One of the reasons for going along the county ditch was to <br />accomplish two things and be able to clean the ditch as well. <br /> <br />Assistant Pnblic Works Director Olson explained it is in their best interest to keep as much grade <br />in the sanitmy sewer as they can by taking the most direct path. He would recommend cleaning <br />thc ditch with this project, but he does not think there is the amount of easement necessary for <br />this. <br /> <br />Councihnember Cook stated there are several reasons he likes this alignment. It reduces the <br />impact on as few residents as possible. Secondly, because it goes through the wetland and <br /> <br />City Council/April 12, 2005 <br /> Page 20 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.