Laserfiche WebLink
Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Preliminary Plat Approval of Northfork - St. Andrews Addition; <br />Case of North Fork, Inc. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik stated that North Fork, Inc. is requesting preliminary <br />plat approval of Northfork - St. Andrews Addition. The plat consists of 44 new single-family <br />residential lots. The subject plat was part of a larger area that received preliminary plat approval <br />in 1995 as Nortbfork Fifth Addition. The preliminary plat for Northfork Fifth Addition expired <br />prior to all phases receiving final plat approval. Therefore, the applicant was required to obtain a <br />new preliminary plat approval. A total of 44 lots are shown on the plat. The lots range in size <br />from 1.02 acres to 3.5 acres, which exceeds the Northfork PUD one-acre minimum lot size. The <br />majority of the lots are between 1.3 acres and 1.75 acres. Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 and Lots 11-13, <br />Block 2, do not meet the 160-foot lot width requirement at the 40-foot building setback line as <br />required by the PUD. Lots 2 and 4, Block 1 area about 120 and 140 feet wide, respectively, at <br />the front setback line. Lot 13, Block 2 is about 150 feet wide while Lots 11 and 12, Block 2 are <br />both about 95 feet wide at the front yard setback. In staff's opinion, there are two options that <br />can be considered to rectify this issue. One, modifications can be made to the lot lines in Block 1 <br />to conform to the PUD width requirement. The same can be said for Lot 13, Block 2. Lots 11 <br />and 12, Block 2 could be required to be combined. The second option would be to require that <br />the homes on the lots mentioned above be built where the lot width reaches 160 feet. The lots <br />are proposed to receive public access from the extension of Saint Andrews Lane to the west and <br />north that will hook up to the existing Inverness Lane NW. The applicant is also proposing two <br />new cul-de-sacs, Inverness Court and St. Andrews Court. Both cul-de-sacs conform to City <br />ordinances and do not exceed 600 feet. However, the naming of the cul-de-sacs deviate from <br />City street naming guidelines and will need City Council approval. In accordance with the May <br />9, 1989 Northfork Park Dedication Agreement, there is a park dedication obligation of $500 per <br />lot to be met in this plat. The City has established a trail development fee of $325 per dwelling <br />unit (effective January 1, 2001) that is collected prior to the release of the final plat for recording. <br />The standard 10 foot drainage and utility easements (five feet on common property lines) area <br />provided on lot perimeters. Additional utility and drainage easements will be needed as <br />referenced in the preliminary plat review letter. This development will require the issuance of a <br />Watershed Management Organization permit. Additionally, an erosion control plan must be <br />submitted to the City as part of the grading and drainage plan. The grading and drainage plan is <br />generally acceptable. Specific changes to the plans are addressed in the preliminary plat review <br />letter. The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat request at their January 2, 2001 <br />meeting. During the public hearing, citizens raised questions regarding the expansion of the <br />existing, man-made lakes, street naming within the plat, the route of trucks during the grading <br />operations, and phasing of the project. <br /> <br />Cottncilmember Anderson stated that the Council has had discussions in the past regarding the <br />naming of the streets and in the past have not deviated from the street planning map. <br /> <br />Mr. Peck replied that the City Council has deviated from the street planning map for the roads <br />around the golf course. The situation that Councilmember Anderson is referring to had to do <br />with an area that was not around the golf course. <br /> <br />City Council/January 23, 2001 <br /> Page 16 of 34 <br /> <br /> <br />