Laserfiche WebLink
-380- <br /> <br />Associate Planner Wald indicated the cul-de-sac is not connected to that cul-de-sac, shoWing <br />how it comes off Erkium Street and 177th Avenue, not Fluorine and 177th Lane. <br /> <br />Mr. Lentz stated is other question is why the City is letting someone put houses on such small <br />lots, and why they are allowing 38 lots on 40 acres. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt advised that in order for the applicant to develop 16 lots now it is a requirement <br />of the review that he show how the rest of the land might be developed in an 'as if' proposal. He <br />stated that before more than 16 lots could be developed there would have to be City sewer and <br />water, as well as another review process similar to this onefi".~:~;!.?~: ~.;'~-;.' <br /> <br />Case #5: Proposed Ordinance to Amend th~ A~cesso~i'S~uchi:re Section of City Code; <br /> Case of City of Ramsey (ContinUed'rublic Hearing) <br /> <br />Presentation .... <br />Assistant Comm~ity Development Director Fr6['i~.J"-h~d:~that the Pla~ng Commission <br />convened a public hearing on April 21, 2005 reg~rding-'~h~:~:p~osed amendments to the <br />accesso~ uses section of Ci~ Code. She stated', a~:that time the ~h~in'g Commission expressed <br />concerns reg~ding the proposed amendmentS:'- including~o-st°~dCes&°~ buildings, the lack <br />of a limit on the number of accesso~ build~gs 0n !arge~Prbpe~ies, and the unlimited square feet <br />alloxvance for accesso~ buildings on pr°Pb~ies th~'ar¢ ~e~i~;th~ 40 acres in size. She stated <br />the Commission continued the public hearing to:~e?regu[~r m'e'bfing in May and requested that <br />Staff revise the proposed amendmems toaddress~ese concems~ <br />Assistant Community Development Director:~F~°~-re~i~wed the'revisions that have been <br />inco~orated into the proposed Ordnance as follows¢'':-~.,-:~ <br /> <br /> ' Prope~ies ~at:~e at least~3.5 acres:but less than 6.5 acres shall be limited to a maximum of <br /> fo~.-aCc'essou buildings on the [°~?Propenies that are at least 6.5 acres but less than ten <br /> acres shall· be_~ted t0: a max imum':°'f:~ve accessou buildings; properties that ~e at least <br /> _:.:tea:ac~s but 'less ¢~ ~enty acrb*'shall be limited to a maximum of six accesso, <br /> :-?b~Idings; properties ~hat ~0:at least twen~ acres but less than fo~ acres shall be limited to <br /> _;~?~:;~maximum of seven a~c~'}so, buildings; and properties that are fo~ acres or greater shall <br /> ?'..be:~ited to a maximum::¢f:~ight accesso~ buildings. <br /> '~' 5~Pe~s-that ~e fony.-'~:b~es or greater in size will be restricted to a maximum of 12,000 <br /> square.-feet of accesso~ b~:ding space. <br /> · Two-st0U-a~c~SSo~ buird[ngs shall only be pem~ned on prope~ies that are ~o acres or <br /> greater and::o~ bY issuahce of a conditional use pe~it. <br /> <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />Chairperson Ni.xt continued the public meeting at 8:24 p.m. <br /> <br />There was no further public input. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2005 <br /> Page 12 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />