Laserfiche WebLink
specifically requires most buildings to be within 0 - 5 feet of the from lot line to create a more <br />urban look to the development. Plans for the first building in RTC 3rd addition have been <br />submitted for review. The plans show canopies extending into the street right of way. The <br />lowest edge of the proposed canopies is 10 feet above the sidewalk. Public works maintenance <br />staff has indicated this should be adequate clearance for any equipment they would use to remove <br />snow or maintain the right-of-way. Minneapolis standards were mentioned several times during <br />discussions with the developer regarding the proposed encroachments. Staff has researched the <br />Minneapolis requirements and offers the following comments. The ordinance is being revised, <br />these comments reflect the existing procedure since the timing of adoption of the revisions is not <br />specified. <br /> <br />· A permit is required for any portion of a building that encroaches into the right-of-way <br /> either above or below ground. <br />· Insurance must be maintained by the owner of the building while the encroachment is in <br /> place, a lapse in insurance will be grounds for initiating the process of revoking the <br /> permit and removing the encroachment. <br />· Doors may not project more than 4 inches when fully open. <br />· Awnings, canopies and marquees must meet specific structural design requirements. <br /> <br />Staff searched the code for several other cities that have buildings in close proximity to the right- <br />of-way to get additional information. Hopkins requires a conditional use permit for all canopies <br />and insurance naming the city as an insured must be maintained while the canopy is in place. St. <br />Paul requires a permit for right-of-way encroachments excluding awnings. <br /> <br />The area between the back of curb and the right-of-way in Ramsey Town Center has planter <br />boxes, boulevard trees, light poles and sidewalks above ground with a duct bank for underground <br />utilities. This style of development is clearly different than the traditional standards found in the <br />zoning code outside of the recently adopted Town Center sections. Specific guidelines need to be <br />adopted to supplement and define the vision shown in the Town Center sections of the zoning <br />code. <br /> <br />City staff recommended implementation of a procedure for review and approval of right-of-way <br />encroachments, including aboveground and underground features. The City Attorney should <br />review the proposed policy. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig stated that the only downfall he can see with the three-foot canopy is that it is <br />not wide enough to walk under if it is raining and it is too wide to avoid the drip coming off the <br />canopy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook inquired if it was possible to make the canopy width requirement half of the <br />width of the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson suggested that the standard requirement be three feet <br />and than they can request a variance if necessary. His concern with going larger than three feet is <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/January 18, 2005 <br /> Page 25 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />