My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 04/19/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2005
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 04/19/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 3:17:25 PM
Creation date
5/23/2005 11:58:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
04/19/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Assistant Director of Public Works Olson stated that was in the letter that was sent. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that was in October and it might not be the best thing to replace <br />all of the sidewalks because of the inconvenience that it's going to cause. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson stated that initially, back in 2002, the contractor was <br />verbally advised. The developer's contractor informed the City's Inspector that it was the <br />intention to slip form the entire sidewalk four inches thick, and then return to replace the sections, <br />so they were told verbally. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that was correct. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson stated that was not exactly correct. The construction <br />inspector had a daily construction log and documented the conversations he had, and that is in his <br />log, so that's a legal document. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated it's also significant that in the log there were two four-inch <br />driveways that were removed with six inches. That is why, if you look at the case, it says 34 <br />remaining driveways are substandard, and nine are broken. He stated that is a total of 35, so two <br />of them actually were replaced. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Kapler stated that they are still covered. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated they are still covered with $38,000 as long as the City holds that and say <br />they forfeited it. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig asked what they would do in the future, looking back at this case. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated they would not allow them to slip the four inches to begin with, <br />and if we know there is a driveway on the street, it needs to be slipped six inches. Now the City <br />has a standard that identifies the thickness on the drive. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig asked if they've doubled-checked the thickness. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson stated that they have. He asked if there is an <br />assessment for replacement if, down the road, the escrow money is gone and the sidewalks fail <br />and need to be replaced. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated this goes along with the sidewalk policy, and not only do you talk <br />about who maintains it, but different cities have different policies as to what happens when the <br />sidewalk becomes effective, but in many older communities there is an assessment. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / April 19, 2005 <br /> Page 12 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.