My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 07/14/2020
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2020
>
Minutes - Council - 07/14/2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:22:07 AM
Creation date
10/21/2020 8:33:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/14/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />He stated that has not done anything either. He stated that the neighbors repeatedly call staff and <br />he has yet to see even one day of compliance. He noted that one day there were 12 vehicles/trailers <br />on the property. He stated that the neighbors are very frustrated that there has not been any <br />progress on this property. He noted that sometimes there are a few days when the number of <br />vehicles is reduced to six, but the number of vehicles simply goes back up after a few days. He <br />stated that staff has decided that eight vehicles could now be on the property due to the number of <br />licensed drivers and yet the property still remains out of compliance. He stated that the neighbors <br />are concerned that some of these issues could cause other problems, using the example of rodents <br />coming because of the trash on the property or groundwater issues that could arise from the <br />vehicles on the property. He stated that after two Resolutions adopted by the Council there is still <br />no progress being made and the neighborhood simply wanted to express concern that it is still not <br />being addressed. <br /> <br />Mayor LeTourneau thanked the resident for providing this input. He stated that this input is an <br />important step for the nuisance case and noted that staff can work with the resident in another way. <br />He recognized that there are cases in the City that continue to have Code violations and require <br />more work. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that he can speak to the vehicles and items allowed, but <br />not the barking dogs. He stated that he was told that the owner obtained the necessary licensure <br />for the animals. He confirmed that there was a major issue with the vehicles and storage on the <br />property, which was more noticeable when Community Development took on the case. He stated <br />that there was more junk and debris in the backyard. He noted that the resident is a senior citizen <br />and does not have much family in town, therefore staff was willing to work with the resident to <br />provide additional time. He stated that there is an active abatement notice that was sent earlier this <br />week with a ten-day compliance period. He noted that action would bring the total number of <br />vehicles under the number of six. He provided an update on the fines and future abatement that <br />could continue to occur for the property. <br /> <br />Mayor LeTourneau summarized that there was a period of time in which the property came into <br />compliance and therefore that case was closed out. He noted that when the property had additional <br />violations, that triggered a new enforcement case, which started the clock over again but now that <br />the abatement process has begun, enforcement can continue on a more swift schedule. <br /> <br />Mr. Newman stated that he disagrees that the property came into compliance at any time during <br />that period. He noted that the number of trailers continues to not be counted in the total number <br />of items allowed on the property. He stated that there are five pitbulls on the property and if a <br />kennel license was going to be issued, that would require a public hearing. <br /> <br />th <br />Greg Drahosh, 5451 164 Lane NW, stated that he is the neighbor to the west of the property in <br />discussion. He asked if the dog licensure mentioned by staff was a kennel license. He stated that <br />he was informed that a kennel license would require a public hearing and he would be notified of <br />such action. He stated that he has yet to be notified of that request. He stated that the dogs bark <br />at all times of the day and night and is a nuisance. He stated that this has been a frustrating issue <br />that this property has not come into compliance. <br /> <br />City Council / July 14, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 18 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.