My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/21/2005 - Special Meeting
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 04/21/2005 - Special Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:55:15 PM
Creation date
6/3/2005 11:02:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Title
Special Meeting
Document Date
04/21/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(!ommissioner Brauer stated that was the direction he was heading, but with the guidelines they <br />have he 15n¢ls himself running into the problem of whether they should apply R-1 requirements, <br />which it will eventually be, or thc requirements for the zoning it is now. <br /> <br />(/ommunily Development Director Trudgeon indicated that in the guidelines the City has the <br /> looking at other alternatives, so if you consider the wetlands, tree preservation, etc., you <br /> at developments on a case by case basis. <br /> <br />(iommissioncr Brauer stated he believes this is close enough to meeting the rural development <br />guidelines that he would consider those standards versus R-1 standards. <br /> <br />(ihuirpcrson Nixt stated he is not willing to go that far, but noted this is similar to Shade Tree <br />Cottages where it was abutting rural and urban lots. He indicated he does not want to modify the <br />,.)rdimmce Ibr each development, but thinks on this development they can make it work with the <br />c u rfc nt oral ilia]lee. <br /> <br />(;ommisskmcr Johnson stated that Commissioner Brauer's point is well taken; they have to <br />~Idcrmirtc which codes they are going to apply, and can address that with an amendment to the <br />~rd immcc. <br /> <br />-Chairperson Nixt stated in order for this development to go forward they have to rezone to R-I, <br />tu ~(_t thi:4 development will work. <br /> <br />l)iscu, ssion continued on the buffering issues, and what changes, if any, would need to be made <br /> guidelines or ordinances. <br /> <br />missioner Johnson asked if Staff is comfortable applying the transition ordinance they have <br />lo olhcr developments. <br /> <br />Communily Development Director Trudgeon indicated they would be, because of the 'other <br />altcrnalivcs' clause. <br /> <br />('ommissioner Brauer stated they could have had someone come in with a development showing <br />minimum lot size who wanted to knock down all the trees and it would be a whole different <br />5-;ituation. <br /> <br />(iommissi~mcr Johnson stated they need to be clear. He indicated when these developments <br />,;,m~e in Ibr thc rural developing area that are platting for urban development that urban <br />development requirements apply. <br /> <br />(ommudty Development Director Trudgeon stated that unless they change the ordinance, more <br />limes than m~t they will end up under other alternatives. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 21, 2005 <br /> Page 13 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.