Laserfiche WebLink
('on,missioner Johnson suggested the City Code ordinance could be amended to say if you are <br />adding space without adding jobs, additional parking is not needed. <br /> <br />('ommissioner Brauer stated he would be more comfortable if they provided documentation that <br />i[~ey do not need lhe additional parking. <br /> <br />(~ommissioncr Fh'auer asked about the comment about White Oaks that did not survive and <br />~,4}lould bc replaced. <br /> <br />As,~ocia!c Planner Wald explained that the original site plan required landscaping surety, and <br />since they are coming with a new site plan it seems reasonable that they should replace any <br />hmdsca~ping that did not survive. <br /> <br />'hai~'pc~'son Nixt asked if this feeds into the regional pond, and the drainage currently provided <br /> thc site is adequate for the addition. <br /> <br />?,.s:s~ciaic Planner Wald indicated it does feed into the regional pond, and the drainage is <br />adcq ua <br /> <br />('hairpers~m Nixt asked if the applicant has any concerns with the Staff Review Letter, which <br />[l~cy did not. <br /> <br />Moti¢m by Commissioner Jolmson, seconded by Commissioner Levine, to recommend that the <br />(;iLv C~>cmcil grant approval of the proposed site plan contingent upon compliance with City Staff <br />l~,ev/cw lx~ttcr dated April 29, 2005. <br /> <br />Amendment by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Levine to require "proof <br />,.~[' parkinf~" lbr7 additional spaces. <br /> <br />),mcndmcnt Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Levine, Brauer, <br />Y4hcphe~'d and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Watson. <br /> <br />('arricd. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Johnson, Levine, Brauer, <br />and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Watson. <br /> <br />( ;ase #4: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Shade Tree Creek; Case of Shade Tree <br />Construction <br /> <br />Associat. e Planner Wald advised that Shade Tree Construction has applied for sketch plan review <br /> develop 16 single-ihmily lots on the property generally located south of 177th Avenue. She <br />imtic~l, cd thc property is 40 acres in size and is currently located in the R-1 Rural Developing <br />district, with a minimum density of 1 lot per 2.5 acres, or 0.4 units per acre, and as submitted the <br />sl(,ctd~ plan is showing approximately 0.4 units per acre. She stated all of the proposed lots <br />ap?ar ~o meet the R-1 Rural Developing standards for lot width, size, and frontage on a public <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />