Laserfiche WebLink
(iommissbncr Brauer noted that this is pushing the limits of a cul-de-sac length, and he may <br />}]t~c'd ~.1 v&Fi~:lnce. <br /> <br />£'hairpcrs(m Nixt asked where the septic would be located. <br /> <br />,,Mr. gtradltmd indicated it would be on the northern property. <br /> <br />Commissi(mcr Van Scoy indicated that at sometime the City Council expects this will be R-1 and <br />d,_,vch~l)cd fiflly. He asked what they do with this type of septic system at that time. <br /> <br />Mt'. Stradlund stated he is actually working on a project now that went to City sewer and the soil <br />has i(~ Ix: treated, it can be done. <br /> <br />('(m~missi()ner Johnson asked if they would be looking at density transition as they look at these <br />xkctch pltms. <br /> <br />/\ss;t~ciai. c Planner Wald stated when the Cluster Ordinance was in the renew process it was <br />assttmcd lhat density transition apply, but after further research it does not appear density <br />u'ansitian would apply. She stated the reason is that the development is going from R-1 to R-1. <br /> <br />Chairperstm Nixt stated, however, that the section being developed is higher density than would <br />bo alMwcd on a regular R-1 development. He indicated they are getting a higher concentration, <br />which is impacting thc adjoining development, and he questions not requiring density <br />t;ansitioning. <br /> <br />('ammJssioncr Brauer argued that it does, reading the code. He stated this is the question he <br />nfiscd at the last meeting on whether density transitioning in the code for R-1 to R-1 is in affect <br />t)~' R--t t(~ Rural Developing. <br /> <br />Assistxn/ (;ommunity Development Director Frolik noted they have to separate density with lot <br />~dxc. <br /> <br />('hah'pcrs~m Nixt asked how that helps the owner of Lot 1 or Lot 2 to the east. He stated he <br />u mt crsttmd s the intent of the ordinance is to buffer from a greater number of units behind existing <br />~lcvcl(~pmcnt. <br /> <br />Associate I'lanner Wald suggested that before preliminary plat they can work with the developer <br />tt) :¢crccn lhe neighbors and provide more buffer. <br /> <br />('c)mmissianer Braucr commented the writing of the interim policy is still ambiguous for R-1 to <br />l~ur;~l I)cvcloping parcels. <br /> <br />('hairpcrs(m Nixt stated they have to look at this as R-1 to Rural Developing and not R-1 to R-1. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2005 <br /> Page 6 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />