Laserfiche WebLink
it llows pt:~>plc with large acreage to develop at the old density, but cluster them on smaller lots on <br />thc prol~crty by showing how the rest of the property could develop in the future. He noted it has <br />worked well in (~thcr communities. <br /> <br />Mt'. Ad ri acn s stated he understands the concept, however the problem the neighbors are having is <br />that they havc been thinking these would be 2 t/2 acre lots, and now it will be a cluster <br />d cvcio p m c n t and they are having trouble tying the two together. <br /> <br />('hairpcrson Nixt stated the good news is this is the only development that will be on this site <br />~mtil services are available. <br /> <br />(!ommissicmcr Johnson added the other good thing is the City has typically found that developers <br />want to make this work with the neighbors, and he suggested they talk to the developer to work <br />r~t~t issues betbre preliminary plat. <br /> <br />· (:om missioner Braner urged the neighbors to work with City Staff and the developer to work out <br />a sotutiot~ ['or both parties, and also to talk to the City Council if they are concerned with the <br />&msity. I lc noted this is the first development the Planning Commission has seen under the new <br />~.~rdinancc. <br /> <br />Mr. Adrir~s asked ill6 lots have been approved. <br /> <br />C'ommissirmer Johnson stated the cluster ordinance has been approved, and this development <br /> thc t~rdinance, however how the lots are laid out is not finalized. <br /> <br />¢ ~(~mmis simmer Van Scoy noted that the Comprehensive Plan is under review, and if Mr. Adrians <br />has a concern with how the City is developing he needs to talk to the City Council and Staff. <br /> <br />Thomas, 17655 Argon Street, indicated what he has shows 38 sites. <br /> <br />As:-;ociate l~lanner Wald stated that shows the potential for development if City sewer and water <br />w<zre av,tilablc, but only 16 lots will be developed until City services are available. <br /> <br />Mr. Thc)mas asked if they would all be single-family lots. <br /> <br />( 'hairpers(m Nixt indicated right now they are all showing as single-family, but when services are <br />:-~,/ail,~blc it could be anything, depending on what the zoning allowed at the time. He stated that <br />is so t'ar out it cannot be determined. <br /> <br />suggested that people with 2 ½ acre lots could have five homes behind them. <br /> <br />Ch~:tirpcrs;(m Nixt indicated that theoretically that would be possible, but they are not considering <br />m~ything l~night except 16 lots. <br /> <br />!vl~'. 'l'h~mqas asked if traffic would run down Erkium Street, or if there is another street. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2005 <br /> Page 9 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />