Laserfiche WebLink
CASE # <br /> <br />REPORT FROM PUBLIC WORKS <br />By: Public Works Staff <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Thc Public Works Committee met on Tuesday, May 17, 2005 and discussed the following <br />seven cases: <br /> <br />CITIZEN INPUT <br /> <br />Nolle <br /> <br />CASE#1 Discuss Feasibility Study for St. Francis Blvd. Frontage Road <br /> Improvement Project #05-24 with Project Property Owners <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />As a result of concerns expressed by Mr. Greg Bolier, one of three property owners along <br />thc St. Francis Boulevard frontage road, the public hearing on this project which was <br />opened at thc May 10 City Council meeting was not adjourned. All three of the property <br />owners were invited to the meeting to discuss their concerns with the project. This is <br />intended to be an opportunity to consider suggestions as to how this project might be <br />modilicd to address resident concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Grog Bolicr who was in attendance at the meeting indicated that he was very <br />concerned about the impact that the widened roadway would have on the landscaping <br />along the front of these properties which provide considerable screening from TH 47. He <br />also appealed to the committee to review the cost sharing proposed for the project. <br /> <br />Staff agreed that this was an extremely unique situation considering the City's need for a <br />trail, thc fact that this was a dead end street, and that only three property owners are <br />available to share in the financing the entire roadway. Staff felt these unique circumstances <br />would allow for the consideration of a 28 foot paved width, with the easternmost eight feet <br />dedicated for trail use. The Committee concurred and directed that the feasibility study be <br />revised identify the costs associated with the trail, the roadway and the cul de sac. The City <br />Council could then consider additional funding participation when the public hearing was <br />continued on JLme 28, 2005. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />Rati fy the consensus of the Public Works Committee. <br /> <br />CASE #2 <br /> <br />Review Placement of Chevrons at the Corner of 169TM Avenue and <br />Neon Street <br /> <br /> <br />