Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. I lunt stated he has to get a permit to put a new roof on, and asked if he would need to follow <br />this ordinance at that time. <br /> <br />Mr. Gordon stated he would not, as it would not go to that level of permits. <br /> <br />Mr. f lunt indicated that to change a plumbing fixture inside the house requires a permit. He <br />wants to make sure that does not trigger all of these other requirements. He stated he wants it to <br />bc very clear it only applies to developers. <br /> <br />Zoning and Recycling Coordinator Anderson stated he believes the latest version makes that <br />clear, that it would be development that triggers this ordinance. <br /> <br />Mt'. l ltmt stated Subd. 2 says to accomplish these things the City will need a whole new <br />department. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted that was taken out. He stated it does not take away the many things the <br />City has to cio, however. <br /> <br />Mr. fhmt noted the ordinance stated the City has determined that wetlands are a defining <br />character of its natural heritage worthy of its protection and preservation. He stated his heritage <br />l'ar exceeds the heritage of the wetlands. He indicated his great grandparents have lived here <br />since bclbre there was any government, and have taken care of the land for years and years. He <br />stated he has also always tried to preserve the land. He advised that in 1995 he bought 40 acres <br />of property, after which the City proposed greenways, so now his house is part of the greenway. <br />ti¢ stated everyone keeps taking his property with the creation of these ordinance, and he wants it <br />to stop. <br /> <br />Mr. f-lunt stated when he purchased this property from Mr. Schroeder he passed on letters that <br />said the DNR controls 15 acres of wetland on the property. He indicated he contacted the DNR <br />in 1995 and the number of acres was increased to 22. He stated he has several portions of land <br />that arc buildable surrounded by wetlands. He indicated if the City takes another easement for <br />wetland buffer it would probably eliminate two of the five buildable sites, and yet no one pays <br />him for this land. He stated if Ramsey wants to buy 35 acres and leave him with the five acres <br />his house is on they can do that, but he wants them to quit taking it without paying for it. <br /> <br />Mr. l lunt cmnmented he does not believe leaving an untouched buffer line is a good idea. He <br />stated ['armcrs used to be encouraged to do that, then inspectors came out and said they had to cut <br />it back because of noxious weeds. He indicated if you are leaving an area natural and <br />unsupervised you will get marijuana growing also. He stated it will be unsupervised land full of <br />noxious weeds, and asked who would be responsible for cleaning that up. He indicated if the <br />City o1' Ramsey has an easement, and his grandsons run into the weeds and get poison ivy, who is <br />responsible. He questioned why the City would want to do something that will cause them major <br />problems. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2005 <br /> Page 14 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />