Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. <br /> <br />Case #11: Refer City's Comprehensive Plan Amendments to the Planning Commission <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that the Ramsey City Council sent a revised Comprehensive <br />Plan to the Metropolitan Council in February of this year and the document was approved on <br />March 28, 2001. As part of the process to adopt the Comprehensive Plan, the City utilized the <br />services of Larry Bakken, a facilitator, to work out agreements prior to the final adoption of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. The facilitator-led discussions were concluded on Monday, November 26, <br />2001. Proposed changes are made primarily in the land use section, however, additional sewer <br />and water land exchanges are made in two other sections of the Comprehensive Plan. The land <br />use section will also include a number of changes to the land use map from the March 28, 2001 <br />approved document. Staff requested that the Council direct the Comprehensive Plan <br />amendments be forwarded to the Planning Commission to hold a public heating in order to <br />comply with State Statute 462.355. After review with the City Attorney, it-was noted that the <br />neighborhood notification process is more appropriately designated for the zoning changes, not. <br />for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. There have been a number of minor Comprehensive <br />Plan amendments that have already begun the Planning Commission process and will be heard <br />by the City during scheduled meeting in December. Staff will seek further clarification to the <br />land use designation for those minor Comprehensive Plan amendments. The final issue <br />discussed during the facilitator-led discussions concerned the proposed Density Transition <br />Ordinance. This matter will be prepared as a case and presented to the Council in December. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that there are roughly 12 changes to the Comprehensive Plan <br />and at least one has to do with land that a developer has requested on a property that they do not <br />own or have a purchase agreement on. That aside, the action the Council took last night during <br />the last meeting with the facilitator was to notify people within 250 feet of any land-use change <br />to inform them as to what would be occurring. If he as a homeowner were to have looked at the <br />Comprehensive Plan previously and found it acceptable he may not continue to follow it and <br />then to find out later there was a last minute change he would be very upset. Secondly he did not <br />think that the Planning Commission is the required body to hold the public hearing. He felt that <br />the Council needs to hear the comments not the Planning Commission, since the Council will be <br />making the final decision. Mr. Hendriksen stated that he would prefer that the public hearing be <br />held in front of the Council and that any property owner who is within 350 feet to any of the last <br />minute changes be notified. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman noted that the Council did not take any action during the meeting <br />with the facilitator only gave direction. All action is taken during a regular City Council <br />meeting, which is why the issue was on the agenda. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained that the Statute for adopting a Comprehensive Plan states that <br />the Planning agency shall hold a public hearing and notice of the public hearing shall be <br />published once at least ten days prior to the hearing in the public newspaper. There is no <br /> <br />City Council/November 27, 2001 <br /> Page 19 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />