Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Smith replied because that is the location of his overhead door of his outbuilding. It would <br />be very hard to go around the house from his residence entrance. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to adopt Resolution <br />#01-10-384 granting final plat approval to Smith Addition contingent upon entering into a <br />development agreement with the City, compliance with City staff review letter dated October 4, <br />2001 except that the right of access along Armstrong Boulevard does not include the existing <br />driveway, and compliance with the recommendation of the Park Commission. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Anderson, Hendriksen, <br />and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: Report from Economic Development Authority <br /> <br />The Economic Development Authority (EDA) met on Monday, August 20, 2001, and discussed <br />the following cases: <br /> <br />1) <br /> <br />Sunfish Commons Revolving Loan <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman stated that the recently adopted Revolving Loan Fund, is <br />intended to fill the financing gap between project costs and private equity by making <br />direct low-interest loans for certain approved business activities within the Ramsey City <br />limits. The multi-tenant retail facility, known as Sunfish Cormnons, located on Highway <br />#10 and to the west of Sunfish Lake Boulevard, is currently under construction. The <br />partners of Sunfish Commons have requested the City consider an application for the <br />Revolving Loan Fund. The Fund currently does not have adequate financing in order to <br />consider such a loan request. The EDA recommended financing the Revolving Loan <br />Fund with other City funds to allow the Sunfish Commons Partnership to make a loan <br />application. The term of the loan would be five years and the Finance Officer has <br />indicated that there are funds available. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to why, when someone is already committed to <br />being in the City, do they all of a sudden need an incentive. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that when the project started there was more <br />asbestos in the old McKay building then they were anticipating, which caused their costs <br />to escalate. At that time the City was working with Amcon, who was also working on <br />this project, and the incentive placed in front of them by the City is if they could bring <br />one or more new businesses to Ramsey, the City could possibly assist with some of the <br />costs. A business did agree to come to the City, which is why this request is being <br />brought forward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to why the Council was not involved in the <br />agreement. <br /> <br />City Council/October 9, 2001 <br /> Page 18 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />