My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/09/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2001
>
Minutes - Council - 10/09/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:31:05 PM
Creation date
5/15/2003 9:10:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/09/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I/IA will meet the required setback from the new property line. In accordance with City Code, a <br />resubdivision plan to show the current development will not obstruct future development of the <br />property to urban standards has been requested. Lot 2 will gain public access from Alpine Drive. <br />Staff recommended that access on Lot 1 be converted from Armstrong Boulevard to Alpine <br />Drive and right of access along Armstrong Boulevard be dedicated to the County except in the <br />vicinity of the existing driveway on Lot 2. <br /> <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that the County is trying to eliminate as many accesses onto <br />County roads as possible. <br /> <br />Mr. David Smith, 15401 Armstrong Boulevard NW, Ramsey, stated that they have their mail <br />delivered to them on Armstrong Boulevard and if they have to change their access onto Alpine <br />Drive they would have to change their mailing address. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if Mr. Smith had a home based business. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if Mr. Smith uses the access from Armstrong Boulevard for his <br />business. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied yes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that Lot 2 should be able to use Alpine Drive without any <br />inconveniences. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied that was correct, but they still would like to retain their existing driveway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that he could foresee in the future someone wanting to build a <br />driveway for lot one on Armstrong Boulevard. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik replied that staff is requiring that they would dedicate <br />right of access along Armstrong Boulevard except in the location of the existing driveway. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen inquired as to what the importance was for keeping the driveway in <br />its current location rather than moving it to the lot line. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith replied that could be done. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak replied that permission would have to be given from Anoka County to <br />move the driveway. She inquired as to why the access on Armstrong Boulevard was necessary <br />for his business. <br /> <br />City Council/October 9, 2001 <br /> Page 17 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.