Laserfiche WebLink
State law allows alternative sites for <br />conducting absentee balloting but requires <br />that these sites remain open for the full 46 <br />days prior to Election Day. For some <br />jurisdictions, staffing alternative sites for the <br />full 46 days is not efficient as these sites <br />may be underutilized until closer to Election <br />Day. Cities should be able to determine the <br />length of time most appropriate for <br />alternative sites to meet the voting demands <br />of their residents. As required by state law, <br />voters would maintain the ability to vote in - <br />person absentee during the full 46-day <br />period at city halls. <br />Current law allows for in -person absentee <br />voting until 5:00 p.m. on the day before <br />Election Day. This does not leave adequate <br />time for election officials to process <br />absentee ballots, prepare supplemental lists <br />indicating which voters have already cast <br />absentee ballots and deliver the lists to <br />precincts prior to opening of the polls on <br />Election Day. The current absentee voting <br />process further requires that additional <br />supplemental lists of final absentee voters be <br />delivered to the polls after the last mail <br />delivery on Election Day and often leads to <br />administrative challenges and increased <br />potential for errors in the process. <br />As more and more voters choose to vote <br />early with absentee balloting, improvements <br />must be made to increase efficiency of <br />administering absentee balloting before <br />Election Day, reduce the potential for errors, <br />and to improve voter experience. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports: <br />a. Reviewing the current in -person <br />absentee ballot process to determine if <br />paper, electronic or a combination of <br />the two processes would be more <br />efficient and be preferable to voters; <br />61 <br />b. Amending state statute to allow <br />elections administrators to begin <br />processing accepted absentee ballots <br />when direct balloting begins at the <br />beginning of the seventh day before <br />Election Day and subsequently, <br />concluding the "claw back" period at <br />the close of business the day before; <br />c. Increasing the time period that an in - <br />person absentee voter can place their <br />ballot directly into a tabulator from <br />seven to 46 days; <br />d. Eliminating the option to place an in - <br />person absentee ballot in a series of <br />envelopes instead of a tabulator; <br />e. Allowing alternative in -person <br />absentee voting sites to be established <br />for less than the full 46 days currently <br />required by state law; <br />f. Establishing an earlier deadline for <br />ending in -person absentee voting; <br />Revising absentee ballot regulations to <br />allow any person 18 and older to <br />witness the absentee process and sign <br />the envelope as a witness; and <br />h. Authorizing cities with health care <br />facilities to schedule election judges to <br />conduct absentee voting at an earlier <br />date in health care facilities. <br />g• <br />SD-71. Loss of Felon Voting Rights <br />Issue: There is confusion as to when voting <br />rights are restored to those convicted of a <br />felony, and notification of restoration is <br />inconsistent or nonexistent. This very often <br />leads to challenges placed on Election Day <br />rosters for those convicted of a felony who <br />are not eligible to vote and election judges <br />must then challenge the voter and spend <br />time and resources determining a voter's <br />eligibility. It would be much clearer if the <br />loss of voting rights occurred only when a <br />person is incarcerated. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities opposes the loss of voting rights for <br />