Laserfiche WebLink
those convicted of a felony who serve the <br />entirety of their sentence in the <br />community and are not incarcerated. If <br />incarcerated, the League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports the restoration of voting <br />rights to those convicted of a felony once <br />they have completed their term of <br />incarceration. This will eliminate the <br />administrative burden of challenging <br />voters at the polls and determining <br />eligibility from various jurisdictions. This <br />will also eliminate the need for <br />investigation by local law enforcement of <br />those who have unknowingly registered to <br />vote or voted before their rights were <br />restored. <br />SD-72. Write-in Candidates in City <br />Elections <br />Issue: For federal, state and county offices, <br />write-in candidates are totaled together as <br />one number for write-in votes. If a candidate <br />wants the write-in votes to be individually <br />recorded, the candidate must file a written <br />request with the Secretary of State no later <br />than seven days before the general or special <br />Election Day. This provides any declared <br />write-in candidate the same provisions for <br />tabulation as a candidate whose name is <br />printed on the ballot. Because this <br />requirement does not exist in city elections, <br />city election officials are required to take <br />considerable time and resources to count and <br />individually record write-in votes cast, many <br />of which are frivolous. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports legislation to: <br />a) give cities the option to require that <br />write-in candidates for local elective <br />offices file a formal request with the <br />chief election official at least seven <br />days before the city election if they <br />wish to have their write-in votes <br />individually recorded; and <br />62 <br />b) allow the city clerk to only compile <br />and report write-in votes for specific <br />candidates if the total number of <br />write-in votes for an office is greater <br />than or equal to the number of votes <br />received by the candidate appearing <br />on the ballot receiving the fewest <br />number of votes. <br />SD-73. Ranked Choice Voting <br />Issue: Current law allows charter cities to <br />consider and adopt Ranked Choice Voting <br />(RCV) as an alternative voting method in <br />local elections. State statute does not extend <br />this authority to statutory cities. <br />Additionally, there are no statewide <br />standards for conducting RCV. The lack of <br />consistent guidelines on how to effectively <br />implement a RCV system imposes <br />significant challenges for election <br />administrators and voters. <br />The Office of the Secretary of State certifies <br />voting systems for cities and counties across <br />the state. This process does not include the <br />systems used for RCV elections. This makes <br />it difficult for cities to access voting systems <br />approved by the state. <br />Minn. Stat. § § 204D.11 and 206.90 require <br />the use of one ballot only for a state general <br />election unless there is a need for a separate <br />judicial ballot. To allow cities that have <br />implemented RCV to hold municipal <br />elections in conjunction with a state general <br />election, state statute must be amended to <br />allow for more than one ballot. <br />Response: The League of Minnesota <br />Cities supports: <br />a) legislation that would give statutory <br />cities the same authority given to <br />charter cities to consider and adopt <br />RCV; <br />