Laserfiche WebLink
Detailed Access Plan <br />While the access principles and policies will help guide agencies in the implementation of the <br />access management plan, a set of detailed maps was prepared that will help communicate the <br />proposed access changes in the corridor. These maps are shown on the following pages <br />(Figures 20-23). The areas are broken down into the segments that have been used throughout <br />the study. <br />The detailed maps show the location of potential full access intersections and potential access <br />restrictions and closures. In addition, the maps show, on a conceptual basis, how frontage or <br />backage roadways may be developed to connect at least some of the full access intersections. <br />The full access locations are consistent with the half -mile spacing concept except for the <br />intersection at Dysprosium/Thurston, which is just slightly less than a half -mile from TH 47. <br />As indicated previously, the access concept and plan represent the long-term goal for the <br />corridor. In some areas that are already developed, it maybe many years before redevelopment <br />occurs and access can be modified to achieve the desired plan or the concept may never fully be <br />achieved due to cost issues and/or physical constraints. In other areas, especially those in which <br />development has not yet occurred, the ability to achieve the desired access spacing will be easier <br />to obtain as plats are proposed and approved. Table 12 summarizes the ease of modifying <br />existing access points to the access concept outlined in the previous section. Access points were <br />rated on a scale of one to three in terms of difficulty in modifying the access to fit with the <br />proposed concept. An access point was rated a one if the parcel had multiple driveways or some <br />alternate access (access could be eliminated or relocated relatively easily); it was rated a two if <br />changes in access were physically possible and it would not add significant circuitity in travel; <br />and a rating of three was given if there was no alternative access to the site and elimination <br />would require site purchase or redevelopment. <br />Implementation Strategies <br />The implementation of the recommended access changes will primarily be opportunity -based <br />and will occur gradually over time. The following implementation strategies are divided into <br />passive strategies and active strategies. <br />Passive Strategies <br />Passive strategies promote access changes as opportunities arise through new plats, subdivisions, <br />access requests and reconstruction projects. Access changes can be promoted through improved <br />direction to local agencies, public officials, landowners and developers. Established corridor <br />goals, objectives, policies and detailed access plan increase the ability of all agencies to respond <br />in a unified manner to access requests. <br />SRF Consulting Group, Inc. - 44 - February 2004 <br />