My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 09/11/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2001
>
Minutes - Council - 09/11/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:30:06 PM
Creation date
5/15/2003 9:58:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/11/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eric Ness, 15390 Ute Street NW, Ramsey, requested that there be some type of transition from a <br />2.5 acre lot to the new development. He suggested having larger lots adjacent to the 2.5 acre lots <br />and then a higher density in the middle. <br /> <br />Mark Barrett, 5221 155th Lane NW, Ramsey, stated that he appreciated the Council for <br />reconsideration of the issue and opening the discussion up to the public. He presented a map of <br />the entire area identifying the existing streets out of the current development showing the limited <br />egress from the existing development and showing a good reason why the stem to 155th should <br />not occur. He stated that 155th Lane is a street that has no curbs, no sidewalks, and no lights and <br />the park is located in the area as well. Mr. Barrett stated that the Fire Chief has indicated that it <br />is important to have access into and out of the development, but he does not see that any <br />emergency vehicle would take a convoluting turn to get into the area, they would take a more <br />direct route. He stated that there is no justification for the connection at 155th Lane. There are <br />many neighbors that are concerned for the serenity of their neighborhood, but that is not what he <br />is arguing for. He is arguing for the safety of their children. Mr. Barrett stated that the life of <br />one individual is more important than making a connection at 155th Lane. If there is a need to <br />make access to the park then there should be a parking lot, but not a through street. He stated <br />that there are visibility issues that are not depicted on the map. Before making any decisions he <br />requested that all Councilmembers visit the site to understand what he is talking about. He <br />strongly recommended that any plan that is considered be amended to close off 155th Lane so that <br />it is not a through street, simply for the safety of the children. <br /> <br />Gary Martz, 5200 - 155~' Lane NW, Ramsey, stated that he sent a letter to the City addressing <br />many of the same concerns that Mr. Barrett had addressed. He expressed that the children are the <br />most important issue. He recommended that 155th Lane be closed off or only allow emergency <br />access. Mr. Martz thanked Centex Homes and the Council for considering the change. <br /> <br />Jon Enstrom, 8702 - 181st Avenue NW, Ramsey, stated that one issue that has been ignored is <br />that the City is concerned about the taxes. He inquired as to what additional costs will be placed <br />on the City by having all the proposed cul-de-sacs. The residents should have been aware of the <br />future through streets. If the people don't want through streets they should be assessed for the <br />additional cost the City will incur for snow removal on all the cul-de-sacs. He noted the <br />additional miles the school buses will have to travel if all the roads in the development are cul- <br />de-sacs and if the children want to play with other children they will have to go all the way <br />around the subdivision because there will be no through streets. People knew there were going <br />to be through streets years ago. <br /> <br />Brent Smith, 15620 Yakima Street NW, Ramsey, stated that they expected to have <br />approximately 40 homes behind them, because the land was platted as one acre lots. He stated <br />that he would be happy to pay for the roads to be cul-de-sacs, with the proposed density. Any <br />rescue vehicles that would come into the development would do so from the south. He stated <br />that he was in favor of all roads in the development being cul-de-sacs except for the accesses <br />from 153rd Avenue, but currently there are no kids that play at the park on 155th Lane and cul-de- <br />sating 155t~' Lane would drive more traffic to Yakima Street. <br /> <br />City Council/September 11, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 23 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.