My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/14/21
Ramsey
>
Economic Development Authority
>
Minutes
>
2020's
>
2021
>
01/14/21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 12:36:27 PM
Creation date
2/17/2021 12:36:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Economic Development Manager Sullivan stated that he would suggest having this $16,000 loan <br />come from the $50,000. He confirmed that staff would recommend that the $50,000 come from <br />the EDA cash balance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen commented that the loan dollars would still fund the City WAC charges. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan confirmed that the loan dollars would still be used to <br />pay the City WAC fee and the only dollars that would go outside of the City would be the SAC <br />charges that are paid to the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Member Heineman asked if this information would be made public to all Ramsey businesses, so <br />that businesses that wish to expand could apply. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that when the City Council approves <br />something it is public information. He stated that it could make sense to publicize this information <br />further. He noted that the intended use of the program is to attract new businesses but there is a <br />provision that allows exception for existing businesses. He agreed that the program could be <br />highlighted further. <br /> <br />Member Heineman commented that if this is going to be used for this business to expand, it would <br />be wise to make other Ramsey businesses aware that if they wish to expand this program would <br />be available. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen clarified that this is a restaurant program and would only apply to that type of <br />business. <br /> <br />Member Riley agreed that it should be used for a new or existing business but noted that the change <br />has to be big enough to add enough seats that it would change water use. <br /> <br />Member Cords stated that he was under the impression that the term exception applied because <br />typically this is only applied to one of the charges and in this case, it is applying to both WAC and <br />SAC. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that the exception word was used for the <br />new versus existing. He stated that perhaps that language be clarified moving forward so that it is <br />understood that both SAC and WAC could be considered. <br />Member Burandt stated that if a business is expanding to the point where additional SAC and <br />WAC is needed, he would not differentiate between new or existing as business growth is business <br />growth. <br />Member Riley asked if the EDA likes the idea of allocating the $50,000 versus taking applications <br />as they come. He stated that he questions $50,000 as the program has been in place for three years <br />without use. He stated that applications could continue to be reviewed as they come. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/ January 14, 2021 <br />Page 3 of 14 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.