My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:51:56 PM
Creation date
6/24/2005 5:13:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/28/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Development Director Trudgeon explained given the proposed amendment to the <br />driveway length, staff has also found it necessary to make a change to the front yard setback <br />requirements in the TC-4 Zoning District. Currently, code has a 0-20 foot front yard setback, <br />with allowances for up to a 30-foot setback in certain instances. Staff would like to clean up <br />code to make the language more clear. Staff is proposing to change the front yard setback to 0- <br />25 feet across the board, with the setback being measured from the front building edge to either <br />the sidewalk, edge of the right-of-way, or the back of the curb, whichever is appropriate. He <br />noted at the May 31, 2005 work session, the Council discussed the proposed ordinance in detail <br />and generally felt that it was acceptable as long as it just applied to the Ramsey Town Center. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Jeffrey, seconded by Councilmember Cook, to introduce an <br />ordinance amending driveway length and front yard setback regulations in the Town Center <br />Zoning District. <br /> <br />};urthcr discussion: Councilmember Elvig stated it has been fun to go through this process and <br />learn what is working. Some of the travels of seeing different Town Center sites have opened <br />the Cotmcil's eyes on how this can work. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Jeffrey, Cook, Elvig, Olson, <br />l~earson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #11: <br /> <br />Adoption of Ordinances to Amend City Code Regarding Accessory <br />Structures, Pools and Zoning Permits <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained City Code currently prohibits the <br />construction of split level and two-story accessory buildings. Also, the maximum height of <br />accessory buildings, which is either 16 or 22 feet, is based on the size of a parcel, with 2.5 acres <br />or more necessary for the greater height. Additionally, the size of accessory buildings is also <br />based on the size ora parcel. However, all parcels 10.6 acres or greater in size are all limited to <br />the same amount of square footage for accessory buildings, which is 5,664 square feet. Finally, <br />the majority of the regulations for swimming pools and spas are currently in Chapter 8 (Building <br />& IJousing) of City Code, yet most are zoning related and would be more appropriately located <br />in Chapter 9 (Zoning & Subdivision of Land). He explained the restriction on two-story and <br />split-level detached accessory buildings would remain intact for properties that are less than two <br />acres in size. However, with the proposed amendment, properties that are two acres or greater in <br />size would now be eligible for a two-story accessory building through the conditional use permit <br />process. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained both the exterior finish of accessory <br />buildings and locating an accessory building nearer the front property line than the home are <br />linked to a two acre threshold, yet the height of accessory buildings is linked to a threshold of 2.5 <br />acres. The proposed amendment would link the height restriction of 16 feet for properties less <br />than two acres and 22 feet for properties that are two acres or greater. He advised the proposed <br />amendment would also create additional size categories for larger properties, starting at ten <br />acres, which would allow for more square footage for accessory building space. While large <br /> <br />City Council / June 14, 2005 <br /> Page 17 of 29 <br /> <br />-6-/- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.