My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2005
>
Agenda - Council - 06/28/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 1:51:56 PM
Creation date
6/24/2005 5:13:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/28/2005
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
400
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
since thc Iow bidder submitted a high per ton unit price for this item. This would have the effect <br />of increasing the competitive advantage of the low bidder. The low bidder, Bauerly Companies, <br />has previously performed bituminous overlay work in the City, most recently under last year's <br />street maintenance program. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski advised staff recommends that Council adopt the resolutions awarding <br />Divisions A and B of the 2005 Street Maintenance Program to the respective low bidders Allied <br />Blacktop Co. in the amount of $165,129.95, and Bauerly Companies in the amount of <br />$281,001.65. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook commended the Engineering Staff on the bidding process and estimates. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cook, seconded by Councilmember Elvig, to adopt resolutions #05- <br />06-173 and #05 ~06-174 awarding Divisions A and B of the 2005 Street Maintenance Program to <br />thc respective Iow bidders of Allied Blacktop Co. in the amount of $165,129.95 and Bauerly <br />Companies in thc amount of $281,001.65. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Cook, Elvig, Jeffrey, Olson, <br />l~earson, and Strommen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case/415: <br /> <br />Consider Entering into an Agreement with the BNSF Railway Company to <br />Update the Railroad Crossing at Alpine Drive <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained the City received notice from TDKA Engineers, acting as the <br />agcnt for the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, that the Roadmaster will have a <br />BNSF crew in the Ramsey area within the next several weeks to work on various railroad street <br />crossings. The railroad crossing on Alpine Drive, the only City street railroad crossing .in the <br />City, is an extremely rough crossing and should be considered for being upgraded. This crossing <br />has been a source of citizen complaints. TKDA has identified a cost to the City for replacement <br />of this crossing with new concrete crossing panels at $32,000. This amount is one third of the <br />actual cost of $1,200 per foot. Staff has been informed that if the City would request the railroad <br />to pertbrm this work at a time when work was not being scheduled within the area the cost of the <br />crossing replacement would ba the full Cost of the work. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski explained the roughness of the crossing is at least in part due to the fact <br />that there is an elevation difference of four inches between the two tracks, which are ten feet <br />apart. In discussing the crossing replacement with the TKDA representative, staff has been told <br />that the easterly rail would be raised such that both tracks would be at the same elevation. In <br />addition to the concrete panels the work performed by the railroad will include replacing the <br />bituminous pavement in between the two tracks and on both sides of the approaches, however, <br />because of the raising of the east track it will be necessary to regrade this approach a distance of <br />30 t'eet to provide a smooth transition. Staff has still to discuss with the roadmaster whether this <br />length of street transitioning would be included in the $32,000 agreement amount. To be <br />conservative an additional $2,000 should be budgeted in the event the railroad will not include <br />this much approach work in the lump sum charge. He advised this opportunity for improving <br />Ibis crossing was not anticipated during the preparation of the 2005 budget. However, because <br /> <br />City Council / June 14, 2005 <br /> Page 21 of 29 <br /> <br />-71- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.