Laserfiche WebLink
wildlife, fisheries, aesthetics, and recreation. Development of the watershed for residential, commercial, <br />and land uses (see Section 2.3) has resulted in the loss of wetlands and natural vegetation. However, many <br />wetlands, areas of biological significant, and other natural areas remain (see Figure 2-9, Figure 2-14, and <br />Figure 2-15). Most natural and semi -natural areas are located within city and regional parks and are <br />protected from future development. Within the watershed, the LRRWMO protects wetland from further <br />loss and degradation through administration of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) and LRRWMO <br />permit program (see Section 5.3.2.1.). <br />Many of the hydrologic, water quality, and habitat benefits achieved by wetland and shoreland areas are <br />dependent on the presence of buffers — upland, vegetated areas located adjacent to wetlands and <br />shoreland areas. Establishing buffers in developed areas may be difficult, as existing structures may be <br />located within the desired buffer area. Redevelopment offers an opportunity to establish adequate buffers <br />in areas that are already developed. The LRRWMO requires buffers to be maintained around wetlands <br />during construction, but does not require permanent wetland buffers. During Plan development, the TAC <br />noted a need for continued wetland education. <br />The development and preservation of buffers along the Rum River and Mississippi River are regulated by <br />state shoreland requirements (see Section 2.9.1 and Section 2.9.2) and enforced by cities at the local level. <br />The CAC cited lack of adequate vegetated buffers along portions of the Rum River as a specific concern. <br />The LRRWMO assists member cities, as requested, in addressing buffer and shoreline issues on a case -by - <br />case basis. <br />The ecological functions, quality, and recreational benefits of natural resources may be negatively <br />impacted by aquatic and terrestrial invasive species — non-native plants and animals that outcompete and <br />displace native species. The MDNR established the Invasive Species Program in 1991. The program is <br />designed to implement actions to prevent the spread of invasive species and reduce the impacts caused <br />by invasive species to Minnesota's ecology, society, and economy. The MDNR provides technical support <br />to counties, local governments, and their partners to develop AIS prevention strategies. The MDNR also <br />maintains a list of waters infested with specific AIS — no LRRWMO waterbodies are listed as of 2020. The <br />LRRWMO will continue to work with its member cities, Anoka County, and the MDNR to identify, track, <br />and manage future AIS issues within the watershed. <br />During Plan development, member cities were polled and did not identify known invasive species within <br />the watershed. <br />Maintaining clean, safe groundwater supplies is critical to human and environmental health and to the <br />economic and social vitality of communities. Residents within the LRRWMO obtain their drinking water <br />from municipal groundwater wells and private domestic wells. Most private wells are located in the <br />surficial aquifer, which is sensitive to contamination within the watershed (see Figure 2-6). Potential <br />sources of contamination include leaking underground storage tanks, unsealed wells, failing or non- <br />performing subsurface sewage treatment systems (SSTS), infiltration of contaminated surface water, and <br />others (see Section 2.10). Owners of private wells may not be aware of water quality issues (which may <br />3-7 <br />