Laserfiche WebLink
stated that he does not like allowing these containers in this area and would like to see the <br />containers perhaps fenced. <br /> <br />Commissioner Woestehoff stated that he also has concerns as this is an interested location and <br />zoning compliance. He stated that he also has concerns with salt being placed into metal containers <br />as the containers could rust more quickly. He stated that the containers are meant to store things <br />but in the aerial photographs you can see materials stored outside of the containers. He estimated <br />that another two containers would be needed in order to contain all the equipment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if the Commission should table this request and the applicant could <br />come back with a better site layout and how the containers could be arranged to be more aesthetic. <br />He stated that perhaps screening be placed around the containers as well. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that there is a not a specific timeline as the containers <br />are already on site. She stated that having gravel placed is a priority of staff as the site is dirt and <br />there is a concern that it would snow before that could happen. She stated that if the Commission <br />would like to see a revised plan making the containers less visible from Armstrong Retail, staff <br />can work on that administratively and bring that forward to the Council once they believe it is <br />ready. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to table this review to <br />allow staff to work with the applicant to present a more favorable layout for the storage containers <br />that may include screening. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br /> <br />Commissioner Peters aye <br />Commissioner Woestehoff aye <br />Commissioner Anderson aye <br />Commissioner Gengler aye <br />Commissioner VanScoy aye <br />Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> <br />Motion Carried. <br /> <br />7. COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />thth <br />7.01: Review Concept Plan for Rivenwick 4 Addition; Case of Lennar for Rivenwick 4 <br />Concept Plan (Project 20-134) <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the Staff Report stating that staff is open to this <br />compromise request if the land uses within the PUD contain the same amount of commercial a <br />previously directed. Public Works and Public Safety had a few concerns about the public road <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ December 3, 2020 <br />Page 9 of 15 <br /> <br />